<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rick Jensen Temp-Tests New IMR 4451</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/02/rick-jensen-temp-tests-new-imr-4451/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/02/rick-jensen-temp-tests-new-imr-4451/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 10:05:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Bartley</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/02/rick-jensen-temp-tests-new-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-51950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Bartley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56023#comment-51950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this article!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick wimble</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/02/rick-jensen-temp-tests-new-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-51851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nick wimble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 22:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56023#comment-51851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Been using 4451 (45gr) in .243win w/ Sierra 85gr HPBT WLR primer, PPU case 22&quot; Savage 10, and getting  3440 fps, with no sign of excessive pressure....and fantastic accuracy  (.65) will work up a load with 85gr Nosler partitions, and hope for similar results, although nosler data indicates a max load of 41.5 gr, so will start at a lesser charge, than with the other bullets ....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been using 4451 (45gr) in .243win w/ Sierra 85gr HPBT WLR primer, PPU case 22&#8243; Savage 10, and getting  3440 fps, with no sign of excessive pressure&#8230;.and fantastic accuracy  (.65) will work up a load with 85gr Nosler partitions, and hope for similar results, although nosler data indicates a max load of 41.5 gr, so will start at a lesser charge, than with the other bullets &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/02/rick-jensen-temp-tests-new-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-48808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56023#comment-48808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Murray, what were your results with the 4451 in 260rem?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murray, what were your results with the 4451 in 260rem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/02/rick-jensen-temp-tests-new-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-46913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 01:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56023#comment-46913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just acquired the IMR4451 and IMR4166 .

 I will do my testing with a 260 rem and a 1-8&quot; - 22-250 Rem .

 Your test/article is great and much appreciated . Thank you .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just acquired the IMR4451 and IMR4166 .</p>
<p> I will do my testing with a 260 rem and a 1-8&#8243; &#8211; 22-250 Rem .</p>
<p> Your test/article is great and much appreciated . Thank you .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Jensen</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/02/rick-jensen-temp-tests-new-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-46839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Jensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 03:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56023#comment-46839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most 284 reloading data you find in books comes from the hunting days. The Berger manual is about the only ones that has any modern relative match bullet data in that I know of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most 284 reloading data you find in books comes from the hunting days. The Berger manual is about the only ones that has any modern relative match bullet data in that I know of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/02/rick-jensen-temp-tests-new-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-46837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56023#comment-46837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Off topic but Interesting that Nosler found that RL 15 was the most accurate powder in .284 with both a 160 and 175 grain bullets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off topic but Interesting that Nosler found that RL 15 was the most accurate powder in .284 with both a 160 and 175 grain bullets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Jensen</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/02/rick-jensen-temp-tests-new-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-46834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Jensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56023#comment-46834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No Kris they were not. I shot slow enough and it was cold enough out side that day that I don&#039;t believe barrel heat played any roll in the effects. All I was trying to accomplish with this was a true head to head comparison of IMR4451 to H4350]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Kris they were not. I shot slow enough and it was cold enough out side that day that I don&#8217;t believe barrel heat played any roll in the effects. All I was trying to accomplish with this was a true head to head comparison of IMR4451 to H4350</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/02/rick-jensen-temp-tests-new-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-46833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56023#comment-46833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IMR 4350 and H4350 are close, Varget is much faster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMR 4350 and H4350 are close, Varget is much faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/02/rick-jensen-temp-tests-new-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-46832</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56023#comment-46832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where the rounds shot in a round-robin fashion (cold, room, hot, cold, room , hot...) to distribute the effects of barrel fouling and heating?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where the rounds shot in a round-robin fashion (cold, room, hot, cold, room , hot&#8230;) to distribute the effects of barrel fouling and heating?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bevan</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/02/rick-jensen-temp-tests-new-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-46830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bevan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56023#comment-46830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How different is H4350 from IMR4350?  I am currently testing IMR4350 as a replacement for Varget.  At least on the burn rate rankings the IMR4350 is very close to H4350.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How different is H4350 from IMR4350?  I am currently testing IMR4350 as a replacement for Varget.  At least on the burn rate rankings the IMR4350 is very close to H4350.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
