<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Illustrated History of the Second Amendment (Part Two)</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/03/illustrated-history-of-the-second-amendment-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/03/illustrated-history-of-the-second-amendment-part-two/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 11:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/03/illustrated-history-of-the-second-amendment-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-47117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56134#comment-47117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would love to have a pistol like that, to wear it would be a honor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would love to have a pistol like that, to wear it would be a honor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dino</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/03/illustrated-history-of-the-second-amendment-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-47107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56134#comment-47107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is often a polarization of view in articles like these, and this one is no exception. Clearly this author takes the view of an attorney. Carefully filtering what is included in the research and what is not, he supports the view that &quot;there is much work for the lawyers...&quot;, or that &quot;In the end, law, and not guns, secures society&#039;s boundaries.&quot; It is his point of view, but to me it smacks of someone who believes his contribution is more important than those guys with the guns who do all the dirty work...  go ahead and try one without the other, see how well that turns out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is often a polarization of view in articles like these, and this one is no exception. Clearly this author takes the view of an attorney. Carefully filtering what is included in the research and what is not, he supports the view that &#8220;there is much work for the lawyers&#8230;&#8221;, or that &#8220;In the end, law, and not guns, secures society&#8217;s boundaries.&#8221; It is his point of view, but to me it smacks of someone who believes his contribution is more important than those guys with the guns who do all the dirty work&#8230;  go ahead and try one without the other, see how well that turns out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
