https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/04/firearm-finishes-comparison-testing-in-salt-chamber/ from AccurateShooter.com Sat, 04 Jul 2026 23:02:57 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26 https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/04/firearm-finishes-comparison-testing-in-salt-chamber/comment-page-1/#comment-47391 Sun, 12 Apr 2015 09:36:23 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56254#comment-47391 316 stainless should have been used. NOT 416. The ROBAR finishes should also have been tested. They usually blow everyone out of the water!!

]]> https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/04/firearm-finishes-comparison-testing-in-salt-chamber/comment-page-1/#comment-47378 Fri, 10 Apr 2015 20:46:49 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56254#comment-47378 Hard to understand why a company would not make its COMPARATIVE testing scenario as transparent as possible. At minimum by making sure everything is identical except for the variable being compared. In the video the second test uses the same test pieces for each competitor. However in the first test (in the video), corrosion, the test pieces are NOT the same. The video noted they are not the same as if that was no issue, just matter of fact. Sorry, NOT reasonable since corrosion is much more likely when there are sharp corners/edges, with possibly different corner.edge radii, and possibly a significant difference in the number of such corners/edges. So, WHY wasn’t the same product used for all test pieces?

]]>