<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bullet Concentricity and Related Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/05/bullet-concentricity-and-related-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/05/bullet-concentricity-and-related-issues/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/05/bullet-concentricity-and-related-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-49549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2015 15:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54841#comment-49549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I continue to read about how much runout is too much or how much is acceptable. Could someone please tell me how these numbers mean anything? The spot you pick to make your measurement affects the number you get. I am no mathematician but it is visibly evident that the farther from the case (or closer to the bullet tip if you prefer)you look at, the bigger the reading you will get. It seems to me that the only relevant number as gar as comparison is concerned is zero.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I continue to read about how much runout is too much or how much is acceptable. Could someone please tell me how these numbers mean anything? The spot you pick to make your measurement affects the number you get. I am no mathematician but it is visibly evident that the farther from the case (or closer to the bullet tip if you prefer)you look at, the bigger the reading you will get. It seems to me that the only relevant number as gar as comparison is concerned is zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/05/bullet-concentricity-and-related-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-49548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2015 01:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54841#comment-49548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently had my .280AI doing my head in. Groups with new Nosler brass were around 1/4MOA yet once I started neck sizing them my groups blew out to over an inch. Turns out my Redding neck die was introducing 0.008&quot; runout whereas my FL die was under 0.002&quot;. Only worked out what was going on after purchasing a 21st Century runout guage. I love Redding gear but even they let the odd bad one slip through. I have a dozen other sets of Redding dies with no issues. Without a concentricity gauge I&#039;d have been none the wiser.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently had my .280AI doing my head in. Groups with new Nosler brass were around 1/4MOA yet once I started neck sizing them my groups blew out to over an inch. Turns out my Redding neck die was introducing 0.008&#8243; runout whereas my FL die was under 0.002&#8243;. Only worked out what was going on after purchasing a 21st Century runout guage. I love Redding gear but even they let the odd bad one slip through. I have a dozen other sets of Redding dies with no issues. Without a concentricity gauge I&#8217;d have been none the wiser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/05/bullet-concentricity-and-related-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-47824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54841#comment-47824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question, If your free bore diameter is not huge, then would not the bullets self align? Lite neck tension and jammed bullets are kind of a way to correct human error.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question, If your free bore diameter is not huge, then would not the bullets self align? Lite neck tension and jammed bullets are kind of a way to correct human error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/05/bullet-concentricity-and-related-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-47823</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 17:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54841#comment-47823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps not, but Sinclair and Accurateshooter both have a significantly larger footprint than German, despite his clear expertise and writing ability. If for that reason only this article was published, it would have been worth it, so Bigguy, your post is a little irrelevant to the progress being made. 

Furthermore, if you think that German is the orignator of this wisdom, you are mistaken by at least 2 centuries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps not, but Sinclair and Accurateshooter both have a significantly larger footprint than German, despite his clear expertise and writing ability. If for that reason only this article was published, it would have been worth it, so Bigguy, your post is a little irrelevant to the progress being made. </p>
<p>Furthermore, if you think that German is the orignator of this wisdom, you are mistaken by at least 2 centuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigguy1951</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/05/bullet-concentricity-and-related-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-44988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bigguy1951]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 00:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54841#comment-44988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is exactly what German Salazar has been discussing on his blog for years.  Nothing new here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly what German Salazar has been discussing on his blog for years.  Nothing new here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
