<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .308 Win Barrel Cut-Down Test: Velocity vs. Barrel Length</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/06/308-win-barrel-cut-down-test-velocity-vs-barrel-length/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/06/308-win-barrel-cut-down-test-velocity-vs-barrel-length/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 10:05:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest Lovitt</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/06/308-win-barrel-cut-down-test-velocity-vs-barrel-length/comment-page-1/#comment-57643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ernest Lovitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56534#comment-57643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[with all the short barreled rifle/pistols being used with the AR 10, I&#039;d like to see a test on the 308 going down to 12&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with all the short barreled rifle/pistols being used with the AR 10, I&#8217;d like to see a test on the 308 going down to 12&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/06/308-win-barrel-cut-down-test-velocity-vs-barrel-length/comment-page-1/#comment-54597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2018 06:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56534#comment-54597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on the data published in the Rifle Shooter article, the average of most efficient barrel length is 21.7 inches.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the data published in the Rifle Shooter article, the average of most efficient barrel length is 21.7 inches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davdberg</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/06/308-win-barrel-cut-down-test-velocity-vs-barrel-length/comment-page-1/#comment-54423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davdberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56534#comment-54423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone have data on bullet drop vs barrel length?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have data on bullet drop vs barrel length?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Scott</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/06/308-win-barrel-cut-down-test-velocity-vs-barrel-length/comment-page-1/#comment-51103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2016 01:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56534#comment-51103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With F Open shooting it does take a lot of testing over a long time to come up with the &quot;sweet spot&quot; of barrel length for one powder type for barrel, bullet brand/weight/and design alone. As a &quot;Wildcatter&quot; it gets more so! After 15 years I&#039;m still working it out.  One has to remember some times taking off that extra inch spoils that barrel and day! Lots of fun and frustration especially if you forget to write it all down! He,he.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With F Open shooting it does take a lot of testing over a long time to come up with the &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; of barrel length for one powder type for barrel, bullet brand/weight/and design alone. As a &#8220;Wildcatter&#8221; it gets more so! After 15 years I&#8217;m still working it out.  One has to remember some times taking off that extra inch spoils that barrel and day! Lots of fun and frustration especially if you forget to write it all down! He,he.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett L.</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/06/308-win-barrel-cut-down-test-velocity-vs-barrel-length/comment-page-1/#comment-49576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett L.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56534#comment-49576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great test ! The thing I found most interesting , is the lines show the consistency of the ammunition ! The Federal shows a fairly straight line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great test ! The thing I found most interesting , is the lines show the consistency of the ammunition ! The Federal shows a fairly straight line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Praslick</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/06/308-win-barrel-cut-down-test-velocity-vs-barrel-length/comment-page-1/#comment-49574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emil Praslick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56534#comment-49574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a 34&quot; Border on my Palma rifle for a time. Velocity was about 10 FPS below that of my 30&quot; Border. SD&#039;s and ES were superior from the longer barrel, as was the sight picture. This was with Varget powder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a 34&#8243; Border on my Palma rifle for a time. Velocity was about 10 FPS below that of my 30&#8243; Border. SD&#8217;s and ES were superior from the longer barrel, as was the sight picture. This was with Varget powder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/06/308-win-barrel-cut-down-test-velocity-vs-barrel-length/comment-page-1/#comment-49573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56534#comment-49573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Above 28, 30&quot; the change is very slight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Above 28, 30&#8243; the change is very slight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Frye</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/06/308-win-barrel-cut-down-test-velocity-vs-barrel-length/comment-page-1/#comment-47899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T. Frye]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56534#comment-47899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would be more interesting to see maybe 35&quot; barrel down to 28&quot;  Have always heard that barrels quit increasing in velocity after 34&quot;.  Would be interesting to find out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be more interesting to see maybe 35&#8243; barrel down to 28&#8243;  Have always heard that barrels quit increasing in velocity after 34&#8243;.  Would be interesting to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/06/308-win-barrel-cut-down-test-velocity-vs-barrel-length/comment-page-1/#comment-47897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 21:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56534#comment-47897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Richard,

Thanks for the kinds words about the 308 and 300 Win barrel length posts.  We also have a 223 and 7 rem mag up there.  

About the short rifles, I&#039;ve written quite a bit about 16&quot; 308s:

http://rifleshooter.com/2015/02/the-16-inch-308-winchester-bolt-action-rifle/

We stopped at 500 yards, but I had some legit 2.5&quot; 500 yard 5 shot groups.  I think if you tinkered enough you could do 1,000, however I don&#039;t think it is practical.  The short barrels gas out pretty quickly.

photo link: http://rifleshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/custom-16.5-rem-700-308.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,</p>
<p>Thanks for the kinds words about the 308 and 300 Win barrel length posts.  We also have a 223 and 7 rem mag up there.  </p>
<p>About the short rifles, I&#8217;ve written quite a bit about 16&#8243; 308s:</p>
<p><a href="http://rifleshooter.com/2015/02/the-16-inch-308-winchester-bolt-action-rifle/" rel="nofollow">http://rifleshooter.com/2015/02/the-16-inch-308-winchester-bolt-action-rifle/</a></p>
<p>We stopped at 500 yards, but I had some legit 2.5&#8243; 500 yard 5 shot groups.  I think if you tinkered enough you could do 1,000, however I don&#8217;t think it is practical.  The short barrels gas out pretty quickly.</p>
<p>photo link: <a href="http://rifleshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/custom-16.5-rem-700-308.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://rifleshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/custom-16.5-rem-700-308.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/06/308-win-barrel-cut-down-test-velocity-vs-barrel-length/comment-page-1/#comment-47896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56534#comment-47896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great test and I would commend people to read the 300 Win Mag test where they did the same thing.

In the good old days of Precision Shooting magazine (how we miss you!), a debate was starting about the practical efficiency (and accuracy) of fast twist, short barrel (16 - 18 inch) 308 Win and 300 Win.

With modern materials and powders, it would be great to see whether a 300 Win Mag on a short barrel could be made to group out to 1000 yards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great test and I would commend people to read the 300 Win Mag test where they did the same thing.</p>
<p>In the good old days of Precision Shooting magazine (how we miss you!), a debate was starting about the practical efficiency (and accuracy) of fast twist, short barrel (16 &#8211; 18 inch) 308 Win and 300 Win.</p>
<p>With modern materials and powders, it would be great to see whether a 300 Win Mag on a short barrel could be made to group out to 1000 yards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
