Comments on: City of Los Angeles Bans Possession of High-Cap Magazines

By: Gary Eliseo

Gary Eliseo — Mon, 03 Aug 2015 01:54:14 +0000

Ha! Everyone knows the gangstas will be at the front of the line to turn them in

By: Jerry Shaw

Jerry Shaw — Mon, 03 Aug 2015 01:31:26 +0000

Last time I looked, there are plenty of laws against misusing firearms.
If a miscreant is willing to violate the existing laws prohibiting mayhem, he’s not likely to be stopped by another law prohibiting the capacity of mag in the weapon itself.
Once again, LA puts its emphasis on show business and neglects reality.

By: Carl Porter

Carl Porter — Sun, 02 Aug 2015 17:12:03 +0000

Just make sure the cops have magazines that are 10 rounds or smaller. The make them go back to revolvers and shotguns, no more AR-15s in the trunk. Then wait for the next bank robbery there with AK-47s, body armor.

By: Steve

Steve — Sun, 02 Aug 2015 16:40:14 +0000

To David Lawson:

If you think that this will prevent “undesirables” from committing harm or from even obeying a 10 round magazine limit, you are naive.

I don’t think you are un-American, I just think you possess the lack of reasoning to understand that people who will break the law will simply not obey the laws. The logic speaks for itself.

You might want to ask yourself what your opinion might be when these self righteous lawmakers consider you an “undesirable” for simply being a “target shooter”.

By: roy

roy — Sun, 02 Aug 2015 13:41:03 +0000

David David David. Even if you were a legitimate target shooter, do you not see the bigger picture here? LA doesn’t get to rewrite the constitution.

By: David Lawson

David Lawson — Sun, 02 Aug 2015 06:25:22 +0000

To Gary Eliseo.

I am a target shooter who understands the power of a rifle and would like undesirables to not have possession of firearms or explosives.

Do you think anyone who doesent feel as you do is somehow un-american??

By: joe

joe — Sun, 02 Aug 2015 04:55:41 +0000

It seems like the appointed officials are in cahoots with the criminals “helping”them by infringing the citizens’ rights;or probably the measure does not have anything to do with “public safety” but a globalist agenda…

By: Gary Eliseo

Gary Eliseo — Sat, 01 Aug 2015 17:00:58 +0000

David Lawson wrote:
If we had proper checks into applications for gun posession then states would not have to limit magazine size.

At least someone is attempting something of a limit to help public safety.”

I’m guessing your ether an anti gun troll or your not from around these parts

By: Ray

Ray — Sat, 01 Aug 2015 14:03:00 +0000

Good old Califorkinia, One would assume voters would start to wonder why liberal cities seem to have the highest crime rate regardless of their strict gun laws..You would assume they would wonder why their debt and unemployment are usually the highest in the nation.. But that is non of my business

Ray

By: Florian

Florian — Sat, 01 Aug 2015 10:45:58 +0000

Back to revolvers soon…

Ask Jerry Miculek how to shoot 12 shots in under 3 seconds ?

Ask Ruger or Smith & Wesson when they will make a special L.A. 11 rounds revolver in 357 ?

Anyway, when you shoot an Ingram, 10 or 32 rounds will always be only one trigger pull…

God bless you from Switzerland