<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leupold VX-6 7-42x56mm Scope Test by Target Shooter UK</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/07/leupold-vx-6-7-42x56mm-scope-test-by-target-shooter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/07/leupold-vx-6-7-42x56mm-scope-test-by-target-shooter/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 20:57:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.T</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/07/leupold-vx-6-7-42x56mm-scope-test-by-target-shooter/comment-page-1/#comment-48177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr.T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56646#comment-48177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;&#039;Actually, the true click values are closer to 1/8 inch and 1/4 inch (rather than 1/8 MOA and 1/4 MOA)&#039;&#039;

Scope has tracking issues, no one is making scopes to click in inchs vs moa on purpose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221;Actually, the true click values are closer to 1/8 inch and 1/4 inch (rather than 1/8 MOA and 1/4 MOA)&#8221;</p>
<p>Scope has tracking issues, no one is making scopes to click in inchs vs moa on purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/07/leupold-vx-6-7-42x56mm-scope-test-by-target-shooter/comment-page-1/#comment-48162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2015 13:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56646#comment-48162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard,  Leupold and Premier had a working relationship, Premier was the only other authorized repair shop and they also made some of the best boosted high power scopes in the world in the early to mid 90&#039;s.....my point was if they had continued along that line of thinking they would be on top of the target scope world, not just putting their feet in the water this late!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,  Leupold and Premier had a working relationship, Premier was the only other authorized repair shop and they also made some of the best boosted high power scopes in the world in the early to mid 90&#8217;s&#8230;..my point was if they had continued along that line of thinking they would be on top of the target scope world, not just putting their feet in the water this late!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/07/leupold-vx-6-7-42x56mm-scope-test-by-target-shooter/comment-page-1/#comment-48161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 20:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56646#comment-48161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want a lightweight NF BR with better optics then go March!

It is funny to see the old scope companies finally working out the customer is demanding more and better quality optics.  This model is not the answer - but hopefully it is a step in the right direction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want a lightweight NF BR with better optics then go March!</p>
<p>It is funny to see the old scope companies finally working out the customer is demanding more and better quality optics.  This model is not the answer &#8211; but hopefully it is a step in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/07/leupold-vx-6-7-42x56mm-scope-test-by-target-shooter/comment-page-1/#comment-48157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 17:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56646#comment-48157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My opinion, something to compete with a NF BR 12-42x with weight saving and a similar price would have been the money maker...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion, something to compete with a NF BR 12-42x with weight saving and a similar price would have been the money maker&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/07/leupold-vx-6-7-42x56mm-scope-test-by-target-shooter/comment-page-1/#comment-48155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 13:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56646#comment-48155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Premier was the only company Leupold would allow to modify their scopes. I have one Premier did in 03. It has been beat on and worked in the field hard since - INCLUDING A FIRE!! It did not miss a beat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Premier was the only company Leupold would allow to modify their scopes. I have one Premier did in 03. It has been beat on and worked in the field hard since &#8211; INCLUDING A FIRE!! It did not miss a beat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/07/leupold-vx-6-7-42x56mm-scope-test-by-target-shooter/comment-page-1/#comment-48153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 10:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56646#comment-48153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leupold didn&#039;t &quot;sell out&quot;. They grew tired of people sending scopes in for repair that Premier modified.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leupold didn&#8217;t &#8220;sell out&#8221;. They grew tired of people sending scopes in for repair that Premier modified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/07/leupold-vx-6-7-42x56mm-scope-test-by-target-shooter/comment-page-1/#comment-48149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 00:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56646#comment-48149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leupold is 10 years behind, still, they should of never sold out and kept a working relationship with Premier....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leupold is 10 years behind, still, they should of never sold out and kept a working relationship with Premier&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/07/leupold-vx-6-7-42x56mm-scope-test-by-target-shooter/comment-page-1/#comment-48141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56646#comment-48141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Price, Why wouldn&#039;t you choose a 55x NF 0r 60x March?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Price, Why wouldn&#8217;t you choose a 55x NF 0r 60x March?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
