<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High-Quality Powder Funnels from 21st Century Shooting</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/11/57290/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/11/57290/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/11/57290/comment-page-1/#comment-49246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2015 22:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57290#comment-49246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the longer tube and now you have a visual of the powder going into the case. Should help with loaded 4064 into .308 ect. The one draw back I saw with funnel alone was the fact you couldn&#039;t see through it to be sure powder went into the case without peaking in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the longer tube and now you have a visual of the powder going into the case. Should help with loaded 4064 into .308 ect. The one draw back I saw with funnel alone was the fact you couldn&#8217;t see through it to be sure powder went into the case without peaking in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
