<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MIL vs. MOA &#8212; Angular Measurement Basics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/11/mil-vs-moa-angular-measurement-basics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/11/mil-vs-moa-angular-measurement-basics/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Allen</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/11/mil-vs-moa-angular-measurement-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-49361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boyd Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57379#comment-49361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A tenth of a milliradian works out to exactly .36&quot; at 100 yards. A quarter of a MOA is .26&quot; (rounded to two places) at 100 yards. A tenth of  milliradian is a little more than 38% larger or coarser than a quarter MOA,and 277% greater,or coarser than an eighth MOA. 

Recently a friend who had been sucked into the use of reticle hash marks,  came to the conclusion (after a considerable amount of long range shooting) that because a combination of vertical hash marks and horizontal left him trying to hold on target with an unmarked quadrant of his field of view, that using his turrets was more effective and convenient. At my suggesting he adjusts his elevation turret for the distance that he has ranged, and adjusts windage for the average deflection due to the prevailing conditions, which leaves him only having to do slight hold offs for windage based on the variance from average velocity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tenth of a milliradian works out to exactly .36&#8243; at 100 yards. A quarter of a MOA is .26&#8243; (rounded to two places) at 100 yards. A tenth of  milliradian is a little more than 38% larger or coarser than a quarter MOA,and 277% greater,or coarser than an eighth MOA. </p>
<p>Recently a friend who had been sucked into the use of reticle hash marks,  came to the conclusion (after a considerable amount of long range shooting) that because a combination of vertical hash marks and horizontal left him trying to hold on target with an unmarked quadrant of his field of view, that using his turrets was more effective and convenient. At my suggesting he adjusts his elevation turret for the distance that he has ranged, and adjusts windage for the average deflection due to the prevailing conditions, which leaves him only having to do slight hold offs for windage based on the variance from average velocity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
