<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Record Number of Firearms Transactions on Black Friday 2015</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/12/record-number-of-firearms-transactions-on-black-friday-2015/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/12/record-number-of-firearms-transactions-on-black-friday-2015/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:07:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Doherty</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/12/record-number-of-firearms-transactions-on-black-friday-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-49464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Doherty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 05:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57442#comment-49464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pretty impressive for how terrible BF was this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty impressive for how terrible BF was this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/12/record-number-of-firearms-transactions-on-black-friday-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-49461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 02:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57442#comment-49461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the number of NICS checks performed does not equate directly with numbers of firearms purchased, mainly due to delay or deny responses, I believe that it may be equal if not actually higher.

What this data does not account for is two fold:  multiple purchases on one 4473 (and one NICS check) or the transfers that don&#039;t require a NICS check.  A seller is allowed to put up to 4 firearms on a single 4473.  Also, in my home state, if a purchaser is in possession of a valid CPL (Concealed Pistol License), a NICS check is not required. The ratio of CPL transfers to NICS check transfers at my store is about 4:1.  

I think the multiple sales and no NICS required transfers will out number the delay and denied responses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the number of NICS checks performed does not equate directly with numbers of firearms purchased, mainly due to delay or deny responses, I believe that it may be equal if not actually higher.</p>
<p>What this data does not account for is two fold:  multiple purchases on one 4473 (and one NICS check) or the transfers that don&#8217;t require a NICS check.  A seller is allowed to put up to 4 firearms on a single 4473.  Also, in my home state, if a purchaser is in possession of a valid CPL (Concealed Pistol License), a NICS check is not required. The ratio of CPL transfers to NICS check transfers at my store is about 4:1.  </p>
<p>I think the multiple sales and no NICS required transfers will out number the delay and denied responses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
