<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ultimate Precision: Mac McMillan&#8217;s Historic .009&#8243;  Group</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/12/ultimate-precision-mac-mcmillans-historic-009-group/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/12/ultimate-precision-mac-mcmillans-historic-009-group/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 20:26:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/12/ultimate-precision-mac-mcmillans-historic-009-group/comment-page-1/#comment-49702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57565#comment-49702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...when I started handloading at 16...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;when I started handloading at 16&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/12/ultimate-precision-mac-mcmillans-historic-009-group/comment-page-1/#comment-49701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57565#comment-49701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[222 with bullets, brass, primers and powders of 1970&#039;s quality and technology?  Not to mention barrels, triggers and stocks of the 1970&#039;s?  I&#039;m really impressed by McMillan&#039;s accomplishment. 222 was the my first cartridge when I started at 16.  Shot it out of a T/C Contender with 14&quot; bull barrel.  Sub 1/2&quot; groups got me hooked on reloading and guns in general. Love the Triple Deuce!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>222 with bullets, brass, primers and powders of 1970&#8217;s quality and technology?  Not to mention barrels, triggers and stocks of the 1970&#8217;s?  I&#8217;m really impressed by McMillan&#8217;s accomplishment. 222 was the my first cartridge when I started at 16.  Shot it out of a T/C Contender with 14&#8243; bull barrel.  Sub 1/2&#8243; groups got me hooked on reloading and guns in general. Love the Triple Deuce!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/12/ultimate-precision-mac-mcmillans-historic-009-group/comment-page-1/#comment-49654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57565#comment-49654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well the PPC was not invented then so an odd comment....

This one hole group has, and should, stand the test of time.  There was an article in &quot;Precision Shooting&quot; (RIP) about the measuring of the group and how each time the hole was gauged it grow a little.  Also the paper absorbed moisture from humidity and this changed the hole size.

The point being that this group contributed to better measuring procedures for BR and, if measured today, could have been smaller than the accepted 0.009.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the PPC was not invented then so an odd comment&#8230;.</p>
<p>This one hole group has, and should, stand the test of time.  There was an article in &#8220;Precision Shooting&#8221; (RIP) about the measuring of the group and how each time the hole was gauged it grow a little.  Also the paper absorbed moisture from humidity and this changed the hole size.</p>
<p>The point being that this group contributed to better measuring procedures for BR and, if measured today, could have been smaller than the accepted 0.009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/12/ultimate-precision-mac-mcmillans-historic-009-group/comment-page-1/#comment-49653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57565#comment-49653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And was accomplished shooting the 222 Remington. So much for the PPC!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And was accomplished shooting the 222 Remington. So much for the PPC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
