<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vortex 15-60x52mm Golden Eagle Shines in First Field Test</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/02/vortex-15-60x52mm-golden-eagle-shines-in-first-field-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/02/vortex-15-60x52mm-golden-eagle-shines-in-first-field-test/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 10:05:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/02/vortex-15-60x52mm-golden-eagle-shines-in-first-field-test/comment-page-1/#comment-54580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 02:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57787#comment-54580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bet you&#039;d have fewer elevation problems if your Spuhr mount wasn&#039;t on backwards]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet you&#8217;d have fewer elevation problems if your Spuhr mount wasn&#8217;t on backwards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doublegimp</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/02/vortex-15-60x52mm-golden-eagle-shines-in-first-field-test/comment-page-1/#comment-53210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[doublegimp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 14:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57787#comment-53210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This scope is the real deal. Just sold my March, in the same magnification and feature set the only discernable difference is how much lighter your wallet is with March.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This scope is the real deal. Just sold my March, in the same magnification and feature set the only discernable difference is how much lighter your wallet is with March.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dead eye</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/02/vortex-15-60x52mm-golden-eagle-shines-in-first-field-test/comment-page-1/#comment-53165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dead eye]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 03:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57787#comment-53165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow for the moneyits a go...obviously at 60x its very hard to use but I like it at 35x for some of those long shots and still nice and clear]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow for the moneyits a go&#8230;obviously at 60x its very hard to use but I like it at 35x for some of those long shots and still nice and clear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Matthew</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/02/vortex-15-60x52mm-golden-eagle-shines-in-first-field-test/comment-page-1/#comment-50034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Matthew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57787#comment-50034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rifle on the left is my barrel mount stock with my march 10-60 scope, and to be honest if the Vortex had been out when I purchased my march, I would have gone for the Vortex.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rifle on the left is my barrel mount stock with my march 10-60 scope, and to be honest if the Vortex had been out when I purchased my march, I would have gone for the Vortex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Smith</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/02/vortex-15-60x52mm-golden-eagle-shines-in-first-field-test/comment-page-1/#comment-50032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lou Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57787#comment-50032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the red stock on the left?  Is it a barrel mount stock?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the red stock on the left?  Is it a barrel mount stock?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/02/vortex-15-60x52mm-golden-eagle-shines-in-first-field-test/comment-page-1/#comment-50027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57787#comment-50027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it is a bit of a stretch to compare this with a March after only a day&#039;s testing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is a bit of a stretch to compare this with a March after only a day&#8217;s testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/02/vortex-15-60x52mm-golden-eagle-shines-in-first-field-test/comment-page-1/#comment-50026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57787#comment-50026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see Vince, thanks for the info! Yes on the mug :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Vince, thanks for the info! Yes on the mug <img src="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/02/vortex-15-60x52mm-golden-eagle-shines-in-first-field-test/comment-page-1/#comment-50023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57787#comment-50023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe they are made in Japan!

Editor: Yes, according to Vince, they are made in Japan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe they are made in Japan!</p>
<p>Editor: Yes, according to Vince, they are made in Japan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/02/vortex-15-60x52mm-golden-eagle-shines-in-first-field-test/comment-page-1/#comment-50021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57787#comment-50021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I handled and evaluated this optic at the Berger SWN and found it to be very impressive.  Even at max magnification it was clear and bright, edge to edge.  It may be time for me to replace the 32x NXS currently on my F-tr rifle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I handled and evaluated this optic at the Berger SWN and found it to be very impressive.  Even at max magnification it was clear and bright, edge to edge.  It may be time for me to replace the 32x NXS currently on my F-tr rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Gaviscon</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/02/vortex-15-60x52mm-golden-eagle-shines-in-first-field-test/comment-page-1/#comment-50020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Gaviscon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57787#comment-50020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m thinking that at the price it&#039;s not made in Japan, correct?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking that at the price it&#8217;s not made in Japan, correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
