<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6.5 Creedmoor &#8212; Barrel Cut-Down Velocity Tests</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/03/6-5-creedmoor-barrel-cut-down-velocity-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/03/6-5-creedmoor-barrel-cut-down-velocity-tests/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 23:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/03/6-5-creedmoor-barrel-cut-down-velocity-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-57891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2019 15:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57948#comment-57891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[6.5 creedmoor fits in 308 size short action whereas the swede does not .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6.5 creedmoor fits in 308 size short action whereas the swede does not .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hendrik</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/03/6-5-creedmoor-barrel-cut-down-velocity-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-51486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hendrik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 21:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57948#comment-51486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the 6.5x55 is a fine target round and a powerful hunting round with low recoil.
So what is the point in reinventing the wheel over and over again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the 6.5&#215;55 is a fine target round and a powerful hunting round with low recoil.<br />
So what is the point in reinventing the wheel over and over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hubert</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/03/6-5-creedmoor-barrel-cut-down-velocity-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-50295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hubert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 21:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=57948#comment-50295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about 6,5x55SE widely used in Scandinavia and other European countries?
Great ballistics, mild recoil, excellent Lapua brass, less expensive than 6,5x47.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about 6,5x55SE widely used in Scandinavia and other European countries?<br />
Great ballistics, mild recoil, excellent Lapua brass, less expensive than 6,5&#215;47.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
