<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anatomy of a High-BC Bullet &#8212; The New 183gr 7mm MatchKing</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/04/anatomy-of-a-high-bc-bullet-the-new-183gr-7mm-matchking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/04/anatomy-of-a-high-bc-bullet-the-new-183gr-7mm-matchking/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spclark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/04/anatomy-of-a-high-bc-bullet-the-new-183gr-7mm-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-50506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spclark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58007#comment-50506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slim my guess would be 1:9 but I haven&#039;t tried &#039;em yet in mine. Most other 180&#039;s can work in that twist while the longer ones need faster twist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slim my guess would be 1:9 but I haven&#8217;t tried &#8216;em yet in mine. Most other 180&#8217;s can work in that twist while the longer ones need faster twist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slim</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/04/anatomy-of-a-high-bc-bullet-the-new-183gr-7mm-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-50496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 23:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58007#comment-50496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s the minimum twist rate?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the minimum twist rate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Joe</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/04/anatomy-of-a-high-bc-bullet-the-new-183gr-7mm-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-50495</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58007#comment-50495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sierra made/makes the excellent-factory tipped 6mm 115 grain DTAC.  It&#039;s commendable to produce a box-ready competition contender.  7 mm bullet tipping is not as tedious as say expanding the necks of brand new 6.5 mm brass, but it can result in some points looking slightly different from each other and that is not a reassuring feeling. If Sierra gets these as pointed as DTAC&#039;s are, a great many brand loyal shooters will be trying them out.  That they don&#039;t need sorting verges on the amazing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sierra made/makes the excellent-factory tipped 6mm 115 grain DTAC.  It&#8217;s commendable to produce a box-ready competition contender.  7 mm bullet tipping is not as tedious as say expanding the necks of brand new 6.5 mm brass, but it can result in some points looking slightly different from each other and that is not a reassuring feeling. If Sierra gets these as pointed as DTAC&#8217;s are, a great many brand loyal shooters will be trying them out.  That they don&#8217;t need sorting verges on the amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/04/anatomy-of-a-high-bc-bullet-the-new-183gr-7mm-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-50493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58007#comment-50493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When are they going to upgrade the rest of their range like hornady did with their eld bullets?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When are they going to upgrade the rest of their range like hornady did with their eld bullets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/04/anatomy-of-a-high-bc-bullet-the-new-183gr-7mm-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-50492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58007#comment-50492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These were so close in measurement and weight they did not require sorting. 

They shot very consistently.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These were so close in measurement and weight they did not require sorting. </p>
<p>They shot very consistently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/04/anatomy-of-a-high-bc-bullet-the-new-183gr-7mm-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-50485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 21:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58007#comment-50485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow.  Sierra finally catches up with market demand 15 years after the 7mm was found to be a go to caliber.

I need a job in their R&amp;D Department!

Irony aside, this one will come down to price and consistency, if the sorting of other bullets (I&#039;m thinking the 6.5 142 SMKs here) is anything to go by.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Sierra finally catches up with market demand 15 years after the 7mm was found to be a go to caliber.</p>
<p>I need a job in their R&amp;D Department!</p>
<p>Irony aside, this one will come down to price and consistency, if the sorting of other bullets (I&#8217;m thinking the 6.5 142 SMKs here) is anything to go by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kent</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/04/anatomy-of-a-high-bc-bullet-the-new-183gr-7mm-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-50484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58007#comment-50484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They wrote their own page and Tipped them!

Editor: People should be less skeptical here. We have first-hand reports from three nationally-respected F-Open shooters who have been very impressed with these bullets. The sample I inspected had very nice, very uniform tips.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They wrote their own page and Tipped them!</p>
<p>Editor: People should be less skeptical here. We have first-hand reports from three nationally-respected F-Open shooters who have been very impressed with these bullets. The sample I inspected had very nice, very uniform tips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kent</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/04/anatomy-of-a-high-bc-bullet-the-new-183gr-7mm-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-50483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58007#comment-50483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes... But they are TIPPED!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230; But they are TIPPED!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill larson</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/04/anatomy-of-a-high-bc-bullet-the-new-183gr-7mm-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-50482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bill larson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 19:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58007#comment-50482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WOW.......... GREAT NEWS.........]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. GREAT NEWS&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aono</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/04/anatomy-of-a-high-bc-bullet-the-new-183gr-7mm-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-50480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aono]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58007#comment-50480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that they&#039;ve taken tips from Hornady and ogives from Berger perhaps they could take a page from both and publish accurate G7 data?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that they&#8217;ve taken tips from Hornady and ogives from Berger perhaps they could take a page from both and publish accurate G7 data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
