<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Nightforce Competition SR 4.5x24mm Service Rifle Scope</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/06/new-nightforce-competition-sr-4-5x24mm-service-rifle-scope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/06/new-nightforce-competition-sr-4-5x24mm-service-rifle-scope/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/06/new-nightforce-competition-sr-4-5x24mm-service-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-50884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58319#comment-50884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The parallax on the Leupold 4X 33mm is factory set at 150Y and not a issue in the least at 600. With the low power and scope well forward I have no parallax issues at all. Shot 600 today as i do every Thursday, 200 and 199. Some of the tactical scopes are set at 50Y, that may be a different story? I cant say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The parallax on the Leupold 4X 33mm is factory set at 150Y and not a issue in the least at 600. With the low power and scope well forward I have no parallax issues at all. Shot 600 today as i do every Thursday, 200 and 199. Some of the tactical scopes are set at 50Y, that may be a different story? I cant say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil M</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/06/new-nightforce-competition-sr-4-5x24mm-service-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-50878</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58319#comment-50878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike - max power is 4.5. You can&#039;t use a 1-8, even if you keep it turned down. 

To folks suggesting a bigger objective than 24mm - 24mm gives a 5.3mm exit pupil. Unless you are shooting matches in near-dark, that&#039;s plenty of light. The bigger objective (34, etc) will just introduce the possibility of more parallax error. A less-forgiving eyebox is a GOOD thing for a fixed-parallax SR scope.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; max power is 4.5. You can&#8217;t use a 1-8, even if you keep it turned down. </p>
<p>To folks suggesting a bigger objective than 24mm &#8211; 24mm gives a 5.3mm exit pupil. Unless you are shooting matches in near-dark, that&#8217;s plenty of light. The bigger objective (34, etc) will just introduce the possibility of more parallax error. A less-forgiving eyebox is a GOOD thing for a fixed-parallax SR scope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil M</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/06/new-nightforce-competition-sr-4-5x24mm-service-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-50877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58319#comment-50877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adjustable parallax is a non-issue for SR, as long as it&#039;s set at 300yd. 

The Vortex PST is good, but parallax is at 100 vs 200 of the NF. Max parallax error with the NF is 0.95&quot; at 600, vs 2.36&quot; for the Vortex. That matters. 

The Leupold scope that White Oak is offering has parallax fixed at 300yd, which cuts parallax error at 600yd down to a max of 0.47&quot;. With good cheek weld it&#039;ll be even less, and totally a non-issue. 

The Leupold is also $450...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adjustable parallax is a non-issue for SR, as long as it&#8217;s set at 300yd. </p>
<p>The Vortex PST is good, but parallax is at 100 vs 200 of the NF. Max parallax error with the NF is 0.95&#8243; at 600, vs 2.36&#8243; for the Vortex. That matters. </p>
<p>The Leupold scope that White Oak is offering has parallax fixed at 300yd, which cuts parallax error at 600yd down to a max of 0.47&#8243;. With good cheek weld it&#8217;ll be even less, and totally a non-issue. </p>
<p>The Leupold is also $450&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/06/new-nightforce-competition-sr-4-5x24mm-service-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-50875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58319#comment-50875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suggested without looking at the rules, my mistake,4.5 x and 34mm I still think its a better scope for the money. Not just made for cmp.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggested without looking at the rules, my mistake,4.5 x and 34mm I still think its a better scope for the money. Not just made for cmp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/06/new-nightforce-competition-sr-4-5x24mm-service-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-50872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58319#comment-50872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all theirs no reason for a variable. Anybody who has shot smallbore with a 24X or higher standing realizes this. The AMU is using this scope with good success. The zero stop knobs are a plus. The rectical seems to be working. And most importantly they are repeatable, a rare find in a low powered scope. That said im quit happy with my Leupold 4x 33mm with stony point knobs. A $350.00 rig. Getting these scope`s far enough forward and the right height is a bit of a trick but worth the trouble.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all theirs no reason for a variable. Anybody who has shot smallbore with a 24X or higher standing realizes this. The AMU is using this scope with good success. The zero stop knobs are a plus. The rectical seems to be working. And most importantly they are repeatable, a rare find in a low powered scope. That said im quit happy with my Leupold 4x 33mm with stony point knobs. A $350.00 rig. Getting these scope`s far enough forward and the right height is a bit of a trick but worth the trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/06/new-nightforce-competition-sr-4-5x24mm-service-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-50871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58319#comment-50871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IOR 1.5-8 power cannot be used for CMP service rifle competition. 4.5 max power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IOR 1.5-8 power cannot be used for CMP service rifle competition. 4.5 max power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/06/new-nightforce-competition-sr-4-5x24mm-service-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-50866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 02:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58319#comment-50866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok everyone is suggesting other optics, I will do the same, IOR Valdada 1.5-8x26 35mm at 1695.00 with the mount.This scope covers every aspect of service rifle needs and more. At this price you get glass from SCHOTT GLASSWERK made in Germany ( if you never looked trough one IOR scope you have to try to believe...it is the clearest scope I have ever used, even compared side by side with NF  There is only one benefit I see from the NF scope its the weight at 15oz its very light... IOR is 28 oz.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok everyone is suggesting other optics, I will do the same, IOR Valdada 1.5-8&#215;26 35mm at 1695.00 with the mount.This scope covers every aspect of service rifle needs and more. At this price you get glass from SCHOTT GLASSWERK made in Germany ( if you never looked trough one IOR scope you have to try to believe&#8230;it is the clearest scope I have ever used, even compared side by side with NF  There is only one benefit I see from the NF scope its the weight at 15oz its very light&#8230; IOR is 28 oz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/06/new-nightforce-competition-sr-4-5x24mm-service-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-50864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58319#comment-50864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mention of the March scope by Ernest made me look up the March 1-4.5 x 24 option with ED glass and it looks very familiar...  

Have to ask, why are so many of NF&#039;s products now copying March?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mention of the March scope by Ernest made me look up the March 1-4.5 x 24 option with ED glass and it looks very familiar&#8230;  </p>
<p>Have to ask, why are so many of NF&#8217;s products now copying March?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/06/new-nightforce-competition-sr-4-5x24mm-service-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-50863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 20:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58319#comment-50863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[another problem with the reticle is the benchrest-thin crosshairs.  It may work for young Marine eyes but it will disappear in the black for older eyes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another problem with the reticle is the benchrest-thin crosshairs.  It may work for young Marine eyes but it will disappear in the black for older eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/06/new-nightforce-competition-sr-4-5x24mm-service-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-50862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 19:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58319#comment-50862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over $2000.00 for a scope and mount just for service rifle!
NO THANKS!  I work too hard for my money to throw it away like that. Glad I went distinguished the old fashioned way, with iron sights.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over $2000.00 for a scope and mount just for service rifle!<br />
NO THANKS!  I work too hard for my money to throw it away like that. Glad I went distinguished the old fashioned way, with iron sights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
