<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Powder Comparison Test: H4350 vs. IMR 4451</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/powder-comparison-test-h4350-vs-imr-4451/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/powder-comparison-test-h4350-vs-imr-4451/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 20:57:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spclark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/powder-comparison-test-h4350-vs-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-50985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spclark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58399#comment-50985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was hoping IMR4451 would work as a viable H4350 substitute after running out of the three pounds of 4350 I found worked best in my 2016 cartridge project, a 284INCH for 1,000 yards.

Range testing loads at 600 yards gave me good results but last weekend I had some unexpected fliers at 1,000 with 4451 that make me take a step back before using it again.

I did manage to score 16#&#039;s H4350 though but not in time for last weekend.

Atmittedly there may be other issues (neck tension&#039;s my focus at present; this cartridge has a neck like Stan Ware&#039;s 30 Wolfpup!) that caused the fliers so to be fair it may not be the 4451 after all. Same charge weights of each gave virtually identical velocities &amp; spreads over my 35P.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping IMR4451 would work as a viable H4350 substitute after running out of the three pounds of 4350 I found worked best in my 2016 cartridge project, a 284INCH for 1,000 yards.</p>
<p>Range testing loads at 600 yards gave me good results but last weekend I had some unexpected fliers at 1,000 with 4451 that make me take a step back before using it again.</p>
<p>I did manage to score 16#&#8217;s H4350 though but not in time for last weekend.</p>
<p>Atmittedly there may be other issues (neck tension&#8217;s my focus at present; this cartridge has a neck like Stan Ware&#8217;s 30 Wolfpup!) that caused the fliers so to be fair it may not be the 4451 after all. Same charge weights of each gave virtually identical velocities &amp; spreads over my 35P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Map</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/powder-comparison-test-h4350-vs-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-50977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Map]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58399#comment-50977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Test #2 56 degrees should be h4350.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test #2 56 degrees should be h4350.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/powder-comparison-test-h4350-vs-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-50975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58399#comment-50975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His velocity changes are more than mine from cold to warmer temps. I was seeing velocity changes of less than 30FPS in 30 to 80 degree weather with 4451. About the same with H 4350 too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His velocity changes are more than mine from cold to warmer temps. I was seeing velocity changes of less than 30FPS in 30 to 80 degree weather with 4451. About the same with H 4350 too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/powder-comparison-test-h4350-vs-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-50973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58399#comment-50973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did he switch row 2 around to see if we were paying attention?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did he switch row 2 around to see if we were paying attention?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/powder-comparison-test-h4350-vs-imr-4451/comment-page-1/#comment-50972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58399#comment-50972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same company, they should be able to duplicate it. Interesting test.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same company, they should be able to duplicate it. Interesting test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
