<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sweeping Anti-Gun Legislation Enacted in California</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/sweeping-anti-gun-legislation-enacted-in-california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/sweeping-anti-gun-legislation-enacted-in-california/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 16:28:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gref</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/sweeping-anti-gun-legislation-enacted-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-50961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gref]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2016 00:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58367#comment-50961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guy -Actually ISIS already encourages mass shooting style attacks in the USA precisely because in their words we are a country &quot;awash in easily accessible weapons&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guy -Actually ISIS already encourages mass shooting style attacks in the USA precisely because in their words we are a country &#8220;awash in easily accessible weapons&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Washere</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/sweeping-anti-gun-legislation-enacted-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-50948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Washere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58367#comment-50948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a sad day for humanity when logic is beaten by fear. Then again, this is just an example of California sucking just a little bit more every day.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KlvUz6phquo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a sad day for humanity when logic is beaten by fear. Then again, this is just an example of California sucking just a little bit more every day.</p>
<p><a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KlvUz6phquo" rel="nofollow">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KlvUz6phquo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/sweeping-anti-gun-legislation-enacted-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-50944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 18:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58367#comment-50944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A victory for the terrorists, im sure they are pleased.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A victory for the terrorists, im sure they are pleased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Bush</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/sweeping-anti-gun-legislation-enacted-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-50942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Bush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 04:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58367#comment-50942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would appear that the anti-gunners are achieving their goal of nation-wide gun control by acting in only a few states at a time, rather than all-at-once nationally.By disarming the country a few states at a time, the less likely that they would face a public uprising (armed) by the entire country at one time...divide and conquer. Those of us in gun-friendly states will eventually find ourselves outnumbered and surrounded by anti-gun states.To retin our gun rights we must remain united. As ben Franklin said, &quot;we must hang together, for surely we will all hang&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would appear that the anti-gunners are achieving their goal of nation-wide gun control by acting in only a few states at a time, rather than all-at-once nationally.By disarming the country a few states at a time, the less likely that they would face a public uprising (armed) by the entire country at one time&#8230;divide and conquer. Those of us in gun-friendly states will eventually find ourselves outnumbered and surrounded by anti-gun states.To retin our gun rights we must remain united. As ben Franklin said, &#8220;we must hang together, for surely we will all hang&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/sweeping-anti-gun-legislation-enacted-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-50939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2016 16:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58367#comment-50939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d ignore the laws. They can&#039;t keep you in jail forever. Always remember who screwed you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d ignore the laws. They can&#8217;t keep you in jail forever. Always remember who screwed you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELR Researcher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/sweeping-anti-gun-legislation-enacted-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-50934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ELR Researcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 18:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58367#comment-50934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What was not mentioned in this article regarding SB 1235 is the supposed &quot;ban&quot; on Internet sales.  As I read the text of the legislation, Internet sales are NOT banned entirely.  They can still occur if done THRU an &quot;authorized ammunition vendor&quot;.  I&#039;m concluding that from this text:

&quot;30364. (a) The sale, delivery, or transfer of ammunition may only occur in a face-to-face transaction with the seller, deliverer, or transferor being provided bona fide evidence of identity from the purchaser or other transferee, provided, however, that ammunition may be purchased over the Internet or through other means of remote ordering if an ammunition vendor in this state initially receives the ammunition and processes the transfer in compliance with this article, Article 3 (commencing with Section 30345), and Article 4 (commencing with Section 30355). An ammunition vendor is required to promptly and properly process those transactions. An ammunition vendor may charge a fee to process the transfer not to exceed ten dollars ($10) per transaction. An ammunition vendor is not required to house ammunition orders longer than 30 days.&quot;  This was copied from https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB1235

Confusing to me is the repeated use of this introductory text in the &quot;LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL&#039;S DIGEST&quot; - that digest title appears immediately below this heading/line, &quot;[Approved by  Governor  July 01, 2016.  Filed with  Secretary of State  July 01, 2016.]&quot;

&quot;The proposed Safety for All Act of 2016, to be submitted to the voters at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election, if enacted would...&quot; - how is this law if the associated Act has yet to be voted on?

If you want to read the text of this legislation, see https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB1235]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was not mentioned in this article regarding SB 1235 is the supposed &#8220;ban&#8221; on Internet sales.  As I read the text of the legislation, Internet sales are NOT banned entirely.  They can still occur if done THRU an &#8220;authorized ammunition vendor&#8221;.  I&#8217;m concluding that from this text:</p>
<p>&#8220;30364. (a) The sale, delivery, or transfer of ammunition may only occur in a face-to-face transaction with the seller, deliverer, or transferor being provided bona fide evidence of identity from the purchaser or other transferee, provided, however, that ammunition may be purchased over the Internet or through other means of remote ordering if an ammunition vendor in this state initially receives the ammunition and processes the transfer in compliance with this article, Article 3 (commencing with Section 30345), and Article 4 (commencing with Section 30355). An ammunition vendor is required to promptly and properly process those transactions. An ammunition vendor may charge a fee to process the transfer not to exceed ten dollars ($10) per transaction. An ammunition vendor is not required to house ammunition orders longer than 30 days.&#8221;  This was copied from <a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB1235" rel="nofollow">https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB1235</a></p>
<p>Confusing to me is the repeated use of this introductory text in the &#8220;LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL&#8217;S DIGEST&#8221; &#8211; that digest title appears immediately below this heading/line, &#8220;[Approved by  Governor  July 01, 2016.  Filed with  Secretary of State  July 01, 2016.]&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The proposed Safety for All Act of 2016, to be submitted to the voters at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election, if enacted would&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; how is this law if the associated Act has yet to be voted on?</p>
<p>If you want to read the text of this legislation, see <a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB1235" rel="nofollow">https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB1235</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan B</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/sweeping-anti-gun-legislation-enacted-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-50932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allan B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58367#comment-50932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to lee and others who don&#039;t live here; we have single-party rule. Control of both houses, the Governor&#039;s office, and the Federal 9th Circuit. They can, quite literally, do absolutely anything they want, and that&#039;s exactly what they are doing. Next year is expected to be worse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to lee and others who don&#8217;t live here; we have single-party rule. Control of both houses, the Governor&#8217;s office, and the Federal 9th Circuit. They can, quite literally, do absolutely anything they want, and that&#8217;s exactly what they are doing. Next year is expected to be worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/sweeping-anti-gun-legislation-enacted-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-50931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 17:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58367#comment-50931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can one SOB  decide what ok for the law abiding citizens of California?
 this kind of crap has to stop!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can one SOB  decide what ok for the law abiding citizens of California?<br />
 this kind of crap has to stop!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/sweeping-anti-gun-legislation-enacted-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-50930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 16:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58367#comment-50930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps Californians should file criminal charges against those who signed this legislation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Californians should file criminal charges against those who signed this legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/sweeping-anti-gun-legislation-enacted-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-50928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 14:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58367#comment-50928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And as has been the case on most issues, the NRA will do zero in the state of California.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And as has been the case on most issues, the NRA will do zero in the state of California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
