https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/tech-tip-how-to-get-optimal-results-with-quickload-software/ from AccurateShooter.com Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:59:33 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26 https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/tech-tip-how-to-get-optimal-results-with-quickload-software/comment-page-1/#comment-50929 Sat, 02 Jul 2016 15:50:20 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=53674#comment-50929 Following Neil’s theme: Barnes X bullets by default have a higher initial pressure so you’d think that 6.5’s that have a bearing surface ranging from 0.546 to 0.636 would need to be modeled a little differently too.

]]> https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/07/tech-tip-how-to-get-optimal-results-with-quickload-software/comment-page-1/#comment-45453 Fri, 08 Aug 2014 07:49:01 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=53674#comment-45453 I use this a lot myself. Coming from the testing and developing field, I wonder what else could be done to improve its predictive powers? My guess is that most people would choose primers, but the massive variation in primer types and performance and also trying to predict its ignition process would be a nightmare. For me it would be the frictional (static, dynamic, materials) and engraving effects (bullet and throat/bore morphology, materials). I feel that at least these parameters would be easier to model and possible to measure and input by the end user.

]]>