<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New DTAC 115gr Rebated Boat Tail Bullet from David Tubb</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-dtac-115gr-rebated-boat-tail-bullet-from-david-tubb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-dtac-115gr-rebated-boat-tail-bullet-from-david-tubb/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary christy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-dtac-115gr-rebated-boat-tail-bullet-from-david-tubb/comment-page-1/#comment-56992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gary christy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 04:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58536#comment-56992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr Tubb,
  I am a 20 caliber shooter at long distances and Prairie Dogs.  I built a Remington 700 1-7&quot; Pac-Nor barrel that I am currently shooting to 800 yds. My ultimate goal is to see if it will be somewhat successful out to 1000 yds. When I started this project, Berger 55 gr bullets were available.I was very successful in hitting a 16&quot; round steel plate in 15 to 20 mph cross winds at 800 yds. My question is, do you make or recommend a source for 55gr 20 caliber bullets?
Thanks 
  Gary J. Christy
  107 S. Spring Rd.
  Westerville, Oh 43081
  1(614)361-4393]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Tubb,<br />
  I am a 20 caliber shooter at long distances and Prairie Dogs.  I built a Remington 700 1-7&#8243; Pac-Nor barrel that I am currently shooting to 800 yds. My ultimate goal is to see if it will be somewhat successful out to 1000 yds. When I started this project, Berger 55 gr bullets were available.I was very successful in hitting a 16&#8243; round steel plate in 15 to 20 mph cross winds at 800 yds. My question is, do you make or recommend a source for 55gr 20 caliber bullets?<br />
Thanks<br />
  Gary J. Christy<br />
  107 S. Spring Rd.<br />
  Westerville, Oh 43081<br />
  1(614)361-4393</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herb</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-dtac-115gr-rebated-boat-tail-bullet-from-david-tubb/comment-page-1/#comment-55225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 19:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58536#comment-55225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really loved the 115 DTAC bullets. However, at the time DTAC said they would work in a 1:8&quot; twist. I was shooting with the Marine rifle squad at 1,000 yard got 7 Bull&#039;s and 3 tumbled and never made it!!

So I am back to my Lapua&#039;s or Bergers until I get a 7.5&quot; twist barrel.

Love the bullets though!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really loved the 115 DTAC bullets. However, at the time DTAC said they would work in a 1:8&#8243; twist. I was shooting with the Marine rifle squad at 1,000 yard got 7 Bull&#8217;s and 3 tumbled and never made it!!</p>
<p>So I am back to my Lapua&#8217;s or Bergers until I get a 7.5&#8243; twist barrel.</p>
<p>Love the bullets though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-dtac-115gr-rebated-boat-tail-bullet-from-david-tubb/comment-page-1/#comment-51192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2016 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58536#comment-51192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And these comments highlight the US love affair with 6mm over more effective bore sizes...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And these comments highlight the US love affair with 6mm over more effective bore sizes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-dtac-115gr-rebated-boat-tail-bullet-from-david-tubb/comment-page-1/#comment-51191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2016 17:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58536#comment-51191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This could be the answer for those contemplating a 6x47L.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be the answer for those contemplating a 6x47L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve E</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-dtac-115gr-rebated-boat-tail-bullet-from-david-tubb/comment-page-1/#comment-51188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve E]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2016 01:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58536#comment-51188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been running the previous version of his 115 dtacs in 2 different 243 win 1 at 3030 mv the other at 3080 mv neither of which have any issues with vertical dispersion out to 1 mile. And running them with the advertised .588 bc When I ran out of the 2500 I had purchased I quit shooting the rifles. I am impatiently awaiting my 3k pre order to show up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been running the previous version of his 115 dtacs in 2 different 243 win 1 at 3030 mv the other at 3080 mv neither of which have any issues with vertical dispersion out to 1 mile. And running them with the advertised .588 bc When I ran out of the 2500 I had purchased I quit shooting the rifles. I am impatiently awaiting my 3k pre order to show up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-dtac-115gr-rebated-boat-tail-bullet-from-david-tubb/comment-page-1/#comment-51182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58536#comment-51182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[115 DTAC&#039;s have shot great out of my 1:7.7 twist .243 Win.  Very consistent and has allowed me to run cooler burning magnum powders which have given me great barrel life.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>115 DTAC&#8217;s have shot great out of my 1:7.7 twist .243 Win.  Very consistent and has allowed me to run cooler burning magnum powders which have given me great barrel life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-dtac-115gr-rebated-boat-tail-bullet-from-david-tubb/comment-page-1/#comment-51181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 01:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58536#comment-51181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I fired a ton of the 115 DTACS,... never found the specic weight to be an issue in XC or 6x47 Lapua. properly tuned, lets you run with bigger (read higher b.c.) cartridges, all other things being equal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fired a ton of the 115 DTACS,&#8230; never found the specic weight to be an issue in XC or 6&#215;47 Lapua. properly tuned, lets you run with bigger (read higher b.c.) cartridges, all other things being equal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-dtac-115gr-rebated-boat-tail-bullet-from-david-tubb/comment-page-1/#comment-51178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 20:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58536#comment-51178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have alway sound the 115 grain bullets too heavy for calibre - much like Sierra&#039;s experiment with the 155 grain SMKs in 6.5mm.

Look good in a sales pitch but elevation issues start to creep in, be it from poor reloading technique or inconsistencies in the bullet making process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have alway sound the 115 grain bullets too heavy for calibre &#8211; much like Sierra&#8217;s experiment with the 155 grain SMKs in 6.5mm.</p>
<p>Look good in a sales pitch but elevation issues start to creep in, be it from poor reloading technique or inconsistencies in the bullet making process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
