<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Hornady Ballistics Calculator Uses Doppler Radar Bullet Data</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-hornady-ballistics-calculator-uses-doppler-radar-bullet-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-hornady-ballistics-calculator-uses-doppler-radar-bullet-data/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 15:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBM</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-hornady-ballistics-calculator-uses-doppler-radar-bullet-data/comment-page-1/#comment-60169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JBM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2021 22:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58571#comment-60169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The JBM Modified Point Mass calculator has had aerodynamic jump for &gt; 15 years.  And it&#039;s free.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The JBM Modified Point Mass calculator has had aerodynamic jump for &gt; 15 years.  And it&#8217;s free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-hornady-ballistics-calculator-uses-doppler-radar-bullet-data/comment-page-1/#comment-51240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58571#comment-51240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian Litz might have to leave his throne to Dave Emery :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian Litz might have to leave his throne to Dave Emery <img src="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPeelen</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/08/new-hornady-ballistics-calculator-uses-doppler-radar-bullet-data/comment-page-1/#comment-51234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JPeelen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 16:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58571#comment-51234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great contribution to the shooting community. 

There is a bug in the twist field when switching to metric units. With SAE units, twist is to be entered in inches per one revolution (for example 7).
After switching to metric units the header says &quot;calibers per revolutions.&quot; 7 inches would be equivalent to 22.7 calibers for a .308 bullet. But the field shows &quot;118&quot; which is obviously wrong. 
Metric use normally is giving the twist in millimeters. 7&quot; is 178 mm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great contribution to the shooting community. </p>
<p>There is a bug in the twist field when switching to metric units. With SAE units, twist is to be entered in inches per one revolution (for example 7).<br />
After switching to metric units the header says &#8220;calibers per revolutions.&#8221; 7 inches would be equivalent to 22.7 calibers for a .308 bullet. But the field shows &#8220;118&#8221; which is obviously wrong.<br />
Metric use normally is giving the twist in millimeters. 7&#8243; is 178 mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
