<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the .284 Shehane Inherently Accurate? You Better Believe It</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/10/is-the-284-shehane-inherently-accurate-you-better-believe-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/10/is-the-284-shehane-inherently-accurate-you-better-believe-it/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpierce</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/10/is-the-284-shehane-inherently-accurate-you-better-believe-it/comment-page-1/#comment-51502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpierce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56454#comment-51502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was on the warmer side and the barrel was a little faster than usual.  But pushing that bullet at 2890 set a few national records in that barrel.  Thats a mild load compared to a few of my customers that we&#039;re pushing them at almost 3000 fps with 4831sc.  Those primer pockets lasted 2-3 firings.  I told them not to go that hot but that load shot unbelievable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was on the warmer side and the barrel was a little faster than usual.  But pushing that bullet at 2890 set a few national records in that barrel.  Thats a mild load compared to a few of my customers that we&#8217;re pushing them at almost 3000 fps with 4831sc.  Those primer pockets lasted 2-3 firings.  I told them not to go that hot but that load shot unbelievable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/10/is-the-284-shehane-inherently-accurate-you-better-believe-it/comment-page-1/#comment-51438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2016 00:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56454#comment-51438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chronographs must read faster in the northern hemisphere or we get the dud brass down under, I&#039;ve not seen a 284S punch out 2900 plus and keep the primer pocket usable for more than a couple or reloads !!!
Matt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chronographs must read faster in the northern hemisphere or we get the dud brass down under, I&#8217;ve not seen a 284S punch out 2900 plus and keep the primer pocket usable for more than a couple or reloads !!!<br />
Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpierce</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/10/is-the-284-shehane-inherently-accurate-you-better-believe-it/comment-page-1/#comment-47748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpierce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 05:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56454#comment-47748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had quite a few barrels laying around so I figured I could set them back and get a bunch more rounds out of them at the local matches.  First relay at 600 yard fclass with that barrel fireforming was a 200-17x.  Shes still got some life in her, lol.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had quite a few barrels laying around so I figured I could set them back and get a bunch more rounds out of them at the local matches.  First relay at 600 yard fclass with that barrel fireforming was a 200-17x.  Shes still got some life in her, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/10/is-the-284-shehane-inherently-accurate-you-better-believe-it/comment-page-1/#comment-47741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56454#comment-47741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Small correction: the Shehane is not a &quot;40° improved version of the .284 Winchester”.

It has a reduced case taper but the shoulder angle is the same as .284 Win. You’re thinking of the 7mm Walker, which has both the reduced taper and 40° shoulder, and which you talked about in a post earlier this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small correction: the Shehane is not a &#8220;40° improved version of the .284 Winchester”.</p>
<p>It has a reduced case taper but the shoulder angle is the same as .284 Win. You’re thinking of the 7mm Walker, which has both the reduced taper and 40° shoulder, and which you talked about in a post earlier this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/10/is-the-284-shehane-inherently-accurate-you-better-believe-it/comment-page-1/#comment-47736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 16:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56454#comment-47736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He sure is ringing the life out of his barrels.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He sure is ringing the life out of his barrels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
