<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Check Your Scopes&#8217; True Click Values</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/how-to-check-your-scopes-true-click-values/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/how-to-check-your-scopes-true-click-values/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 22:46:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/how-to-check-your-scopes-true-click-values/comment-page-1/#comment-51690</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 22:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=898#comment-51690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lindy always does excellent stuff. 

Keep the articles coming Lindy!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lindy always does excellent stuff. </p>
<p>Keep the articles coming Lindy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/how-to-check-your-scopes-true-click-values/comment-page-1/#comment-51675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Austin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 20:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=898#comment-51675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since the Steiner TX series disaster I&#039;ve been doing tracking tests on each scope I buy that has turrets. So far the only scopes that failed were that Steiner and the Leupold mk6 3-18. Just goes to show that no matter the price point you can get a bum scope. Check your tracking people!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since the Steiner TX series disaster I&#8217;ve been doing tracking tests on each scope I buy that has turrets. So far the only scopes that failed were that Steiner and the Leupold mk6 3-18. Just goes to show that no matter the price point you can get a bum scope. Check your tracking people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELR Researcher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/how-to-check-your-scopes-true-click-values/comment-page-1/#comment-51670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ELR Researcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 21:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=898#comment-51670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bryan Litz&#039;s &quot;Tall Target Test&quot; is on his &quot;Putting Rounds on Target&quot; DVD set.  Excellent presentation!  Interestingly he mentions in that video that NF scopes are almost always dead on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan Litz&#8217;s &#8220;Tall Target Test&#8221; is on his &#8220;Putting Rounds on Target&#8221; DVD set.  Excellent presentation!  Interestingly he mentions in that video that NF scopes are almost always dead on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikecr</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/how-to-check-your-scopes-true-click-values/comment-page-1/#comment-47681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikecr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 20:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=898#comment-47681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve tested Leupold and NF NXS similar, and I always take results to IPHY(highest resolution). I&#039;ve found similar results, VX3=1.00~IPHY, Mk4=1.047IPHY, NF=1.09~IPHY. Four Mk4s tested were all dead nuts true MOA, adjustment range, and optical power. This was not true of two NXS scopes I tested..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tested Leupold and NF NXS similar, and I always take results to IPHY(highest resolution). I&#8217;ve found similar results, VX3=1.00~IPHY, Mk4=1.047IPHY, NF=1.09~IPHY. Four Mk4s tested were all dead nuts true MOA, adjustment range, and optical power. This was not true of two NXS scopes I tested..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
