<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NEW Sierra 6mm 110-Grain MatchKing with Claimed 0.617 G1 BC</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/new-sierra-6mm-110-grain-matchking-with-claimed-0-617-g1-bc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/new-sierra-6mm-110-grain-matchking-with-claimed-0-617-g1-bc/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MH</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/new-sierra-6mm-110-grain-matchking-with-claimed-0-617-g1-bc/comment-page-1/#comment-55504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 18:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58851#comment-55504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s interesting with all this chat about the twist rate needed without mention of at what velocity.

The faster you push the bullet, the slower twist rate is needed.

This is just as confusing to some as the BC at a certain velocity... You need a certain twist rate for a certain velocity.

So maybe 1:8 is OK but only if you run it fast enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting with all this chat about the twist rate needed without mention of at what velocity.</p>
<p>The faster you push the bullet, the slower twist rate is needed.</p>
<p>This is just as confusing to some as the BC at a certain velocity&#8230; You need a certain twist rate for a certain velocity.</p>
<p>So maybe 1:8 is OK but only if you run it fast enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Childs</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/new-sierra-6mm-110-grain-matchking-with-claimed-0-617-g1-bc/comment-page-1/#comment-54640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry Childs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 18:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58851#comment-54640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jay,

I think you are correct, an 8&quot; twist will handle the Sierra 6 mm, 110 gr. MatchKing but probably not at 50-feet AMSL, 20 deg. Fahrenheit, 30.50&quot; Hg corrected barometric pressure and 3000 f/s muzzle velocity.

Now at the Whittington Center in the Summer, there is no question, an 8&quot; twist is adequate for about Sg = 1.5 for the 110 gr. MK.

Please, as a matter of interest, in what conditions did the 8&quot; twist handle the new 6 mm Sierra bullet.

Henry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay,</p>
<p>I think you are correct, an 8&#8243; twist will handle the Sierra 6 mm, 110 gr. MatchKing but probably not at 50-feet AMSL, 20 deg. Fahrenheit, 30.50&#8243; Hg corrected barometric pressure and 3000 f/s muzzle velocity.</p>
<p>Now at the Whittington Center in the Summer, there is no question, an 8&#8243; twist is adequate for about Sg = 1.5 for the 110 gr. MK.</p>
<p>Please, as a matter of interest, in what conditions did the 8&#8243; twist handle the new 6 mm Sierra bullet.</p>
<p>Henry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/new-sierra-6mm-110-grain-matchking-with-claimed-0-617-g1-bc/comment-page-1/#comment-52819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2017 15:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58851#comment-52819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[8 twist is fine with these new 110MK, I shot them, no issues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8 twist is fine with these new 110MK, I shot them, no issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/new-sierra-6mm-110-grain-matchking-with-claimed-0-617-g1-bc/comment-page-1/#comment-51854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 17:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58851#comment-51854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am told Sierra manufactures the 115 Dtac bullet for David tubbs. Will this bullet also come nitride coated as an option?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am told Sierra manufactures the 115 Dtac bullet for David tubbs. Will this bullet also come nitride coated as an option?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David P</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/new-sierra-6mm-110-grain-matchking-with-claimed-0-617-g1-bc/comment-page-1/#comment-51815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58851#comment-51815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This bullet is a game changer. I have done various BC calibrations over the coarse of 1000+ rounds with this bullet. From 1k to past 1 mile, the G7 has always been in the .310-.320 range. Testing out of a 6-Creed and 243win, the same powder charge under a 105 hybrid or 107 pointed SMK (both have almost identical POI at 1k) shows a 24&quot; improvement at 1000 yards despite 40 FPS less velocity!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bullet is a game changer. I have done various BC calibrations over the coarse of 1000+ rounds with this bullet. From 1k to past 1 mile, the G7 has always been in the .310-.320 range. Testing out of a 6-Creed and 243win, the same powder charge under a 105 hybrid or 107 pointed SMK (both have almost identical POI at 1k) shows a 24&#8243; improvement at 1000 yards despite 40 FPS less velocity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aono</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/new-sierra-6mm-110-grain-matchking-with-claimed-0-617-g1-bc/comment-page-1/#comment-51727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aono]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58851#comment-51727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the explanation Bryan. In the hopes that you&#039;ll see this, please consider focusing on lead free projectiles especially like the Cutting Edge MTH, Barnes LRX and TTSX. It&#039;s becoming a legal requirement for many hunters to shoot lead free, and with those controlled expansion bullets it&#039;s very important to be able to understand impact velocity for the sake of making an ethical kill. Of all the bullet types information on these is most lacking.

Thank you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation Bryan. In the hopes that you&#8217;ll see this, please consider focusing on lead free projectiles especially like the Cutting Edge MTH, Barnes LRX and TTSX. It&#8217;s becoming a legal requirement for many hunters to shoot lead free, and with those controlled expansion bullets it&#8217;s very important to be able to understand impact velocity for the sake of making an ethical kill. Of all the bullet types information on these is most lacking.</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Litz</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/new-sierra-6mm-110-grain-matchking-with-claimed-0-617-g1-bc/comment-page-1/#comment-51667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Litz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 12:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58851#comment-51667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sierra&#039;s banded G1 BC&#039;s are typically quite accurate.  They get a bad rap sometimes because shooters don&#039;t know how to interpret the velocity bands and just look at the high velocity number and say &quot;that doesn&#039;t match what I saw at long range&quot;.  If you average all Sierra&#039;s velocity banded G1 BC&#039;s (or use the actual bands in a ballistics program) you usually get pretty accurate drops.

This problem isn&#039;t helped by catalog companies like Midway that only have one number for BC and simply print the highest number with no mention of velocity bands.  If this was your only source of info, it&#039;s certainly misleading.

Also, It&#039;s been quite some time since we&#039;ve (Applied Ballistics) measured the MatchKing line of bullets and many of them are now being pointed.  This is the case with the 107&#039;s discussed above.  We&#039;re making it a priority to update our measurements for bullets that have changed and will be re-measuring the entire MatchKing line of bullets for re-publication.

As far as performance goes, this new 110 SMK looks pretty good.  Just be careful to consider the whole range of velocity-BC&#039;s, and not just the high velocity numbers.

Sierra was perhaps the first to acknowledge the velocity dependence of BC&#039;s and offer the velocity banded solution for G1&#039;s.  Over the years they&#039;ve suffered from this approach because of shooters only looking at the high velocity number and then accusing Sierra of inflating BC&#039;s.  The solution is to provide a single G7 BC, averaged over long range.  Nearly every other major bullet company (Berger, Hornady, Nosler, Lapua, and Barnes) have adopted G7 BC&#039;s in recent years.  Sierra has the ability to do the same if they chose.  Either way, AB will continue to provide independently measured G7 BC&#039;s for all brands as we always have.  One caveat to the AB data, in this case the bullet changed since we last measured it, and so we&#039;ll measure it again.

-Bryan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sierra&#8217;s banded G1 BC&#8217;s are typically quite accurate.  They get a bad rap sometimes because shooters don&#8217;t know how to interpret the velocity bands and just look at the high velocity number and say &#8220;that doesn&#8217;t match what I saw at long range&#8221;.  If you average all Sierra&#8217;s velocity banded G1 BC&#8217;s (or use the actual bands in a ballistics program) you usually get pretty accurate drops.</p>
<p>This problem isn&#8217;t helped by catalog companies like Midway that only have one number for BC and simply print the highest number with no mention of velocity bands.  If this was your only source of info, it&#8217;s certainly misleading.</p>
<p>Also, It&#8217;s been quite some time since we&#8217;ve (Applied Ballistics) measured the MatchKing line of bullets and many of them are now being pointed.  This is the case with the 107&#8217;s discussed above.  We&#8217;re making it a priority to update our measurements for bullets that have changed and will be re-measuring the entire MatchKing line of bullets for re-publication.</p>
<p>As far as performance goes, this new 110 SMK looks pretty good.  Just be careful to consider the whole range of velocity-BC&#8217;s, and not just the high velocity numbers.</p>
<p>Sierra was perhaps the first to acknowledge the velocity dependence of BC&#8217;s and offer the velocity banded solution for G1&#8217;s.  Over the years they&#8217;ve suffered from this approach because of shooters only looking at the high velocity number and then accusing Sierra of inflating BC&#8217;s.  The solution is to provide a single G7 BC, averaged over long range.  Nearly every other major bullet company (Berger, Hornady, Nosler, Lapua, and Barnes) have adopted G7 BC&#8217;s in recent years.  Sierra has the ability to do the same if they chose.  Either way, AB will continue to provide independently measured G7 BC&#8217;s for all brands as we always have.  One caveat to the AB data, in this case the bullet changed since we last measured it, and so we&#8217;ll measure it again.</p>
<p>-Bryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy4064</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/new-sierra-6mm-110-grain-matchking-with-claimed-0-617-g1-bc/comment-page-1/#comment-51663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guy4064]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2016 13:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58851#comment-51663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get to shoot 1000Y often, ive always found Sierra`a BC`s to prove out at the range.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get to shoot 1000Y often, ive always found Sierra`a BC`s to prove out at the range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aono</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/new-sierra-6mm-110-grain-matchking-with-claimed-0-617-g1-bc/comment-page-1/#comment-51657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aono]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 08:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58851#comment-51657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Berger knows as well as we do...&quot;

Nope... Berger knows how to publish accurate G7 data for their own bullets. Hornady doesn&#039;t have a Litz so they got a doppler. You can do better Sierra!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Berger knows as well as we do&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Nope&#8230; Berger knows how to publish accurate G7 data for their own bullets. Hornady doesn&#8217;t have a Litz so they got a doppler. You can do better Sierra!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Wilkinson</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/11/new-sierra-6mm-110-grain-matchking-with-claimed-0-617-g1-bc/comment-page-1/#comment-51652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Wilkinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 02:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58851#comment-51652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Game changer&quot; has been declared.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Game changer&#8221; has been declared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
