<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vince Eyes an Eagle &#8212; Reviews Vortex 15-60x52mm Scope</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/12/vince-eyes-an-eagle-reviews-vortex-15-60x52mm-scope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/12/vince-eyes-an-eagle-reviews-vortex-15-60x52mm-scope/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/12/vince-eyes-an-eagle-reviews-vortex-15-60x52mm-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-51843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vince]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58998#comment-51843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guys, 
We got the scope for one day way back on March when it was on its way to IWA from the Shot Show. That&#039;s when the pic was taken.

The Savage had a 20MOA rail and the only mount we had handy also had a 20MOA taper.

With 40MOA we couldn&#039;t get a 100 yd zero for our tests so we turned it round - thus no taper.

Didn&#039;t seem necessary to re-shoot the photos for this latest test. Didn&#039;t reckon on so many Eagle-eyed readers...
Vince]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys,<br />
We got the scope for one day way back on March when it was on its way to IWA from the Shot Show. That&#8217;s when the pic was taken.</p>
<p>The Savage had a 20MOA rail and the only mount we had handy also had a 20MOA taper.</p>
<p>With 40MOA we couldn&#8217;t get a 100 yd zero for our tests so we turned it round &#8211; thus no taper.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t seem necessary to re-shoot the photos for this latest test. Didn&#8217;t reckon on so many Eagle-eyed readers&#8230;<br />
Vince</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/12/vince-eyes-an-eagle-reviews-vortex-15-60x52mm-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-51839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58998#comment-51839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;bubble facing the front…&#039; maybe they are on both sides?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;bubble facing the front…&#8217; maybe they are on both sides?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B-rad</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/12/vince-eyes-an-eagle-reviews-vortex-15-60x52mm-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-51835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[B-rad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 19:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58998#comment-51835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gonna be tough ensuring the rifle is level with the bubble facing the front...

Editor: Elsewhere Vince acknowledged that the rings (in that photo) needed to be remounted. That was a very quick mount job done for photo purposes only, during Target Shooter&#039;s first view of the Golden Eagle which had to be returned right away. Vince&#039;s full review is from a later test.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gonna be tough ensuring the rifle is level with the bubble facing the front&#8230;</p>
<p>Editor: Elsewhere Vince acknowledged that the rings (in that photo) needed to be remounted. That was a very quick mount job done for photo purposes only, during Target Shooter&#8217;s first view of the Golden Eagle which had to be returned right away. Vince&#8217;s full review is from a later test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judd</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/12/vince-eyes-an-eagle-reviews-vortex-15-60x52mm-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-51834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58998#comment-51834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just recently got mine and after using the NF BR scopes it is a welcome change.  I really like the reticle and how you don&#039;t have a big gap between the dot and the horizontal posts.  I can actually use this scope to hold wind.

I&#039;ve used it in one match and most likely will update all my NF BR scopes to Vortex Golden Eagle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just recently got mine and after using the NF BR scopes it is a welcome change.  I really like the reticle and how you don&#8217;t have a big gap between the dot and the horizontal posts.  I can actually use this scope to hold wind.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used it in one match and most likely will update all my NF BR scopes to Vortex Golden Eagle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Green</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/12/vince-eyes-an-eagle-reviews-vortex-15-60x52mm-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-51833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Green]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58998#comment-51833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Myself and Todd in the shop both ran the Golden Eagle at this years U.S. F Class Champs. They ran great with no issues. Most of the time I had mine set right around 40x. 

Later, Frank
Bartlein Barrels]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Myself and Todd in the shop both ran the Golden Eagle at this years U.S. F Class Champs. They ran great with no issues. Most of the time I had mine set right around 40x. </p>
<p>Later, Frank<br />
Bartlein Barrels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/12/vince-eyes-an-eagle-reviews-vortex-15-60x52mm-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-51831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58998#comment-51831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[but got Kahles K1050.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but got Kahles K1050.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2016/12/vince-eyes-an-eagle-reviews-vortex-15-60x52mm-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-51830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58998#comment-51830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[finaly!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>finaly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
