<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sierra Offers New Ultra-High-BC 197gr 7mm (.284) MatchKing</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/sierra-offers-new-ultra-high-bc-197gr-7mm-284-matchking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/sierra-offers-new-ultra-high-bc-197gr-7mm-284-matchking/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Zolnikov</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/sierra-offers-new-ultra-high-bc-197gr-7mm-284-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-57961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Zolnikov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2020 01:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59124#comment-57961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just tested these in my .284 win 7tw 28in 1.25 straight Krieger barrel. I used RL26 and worked up to 53gr. The 52.2grain load was very precise in the .1 to .2 range and it chono’d at 2550 fp/s. I showed no pressure signs up to 53 so I’ll keep loading up. My testing was done from a bench free recoil style so I have yet to go in the prone with these but I imagine the recoil may be a factor once I go prone...we will see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just tested these in my .284 win 7tw 28in 1.25 straight Krieger barrel. I used RL26 and worked up to 53gr. The 52.2grain load was very precise in the .1 to .2 range and it chono’d at 2550 fp/s. I showed no pressure signs up to 53 so I’ll keep loading up. My testing was done from a bench free recoil style so I have yet to go in the prone with these but I imagine the recoil may be a factor once I go prone&#8230;we will see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smaller</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/sierra-offers-new-ultra-high-bc-197gr-7mm-284-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-53777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smaller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 15:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59124#comment-53777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For David Joe:
Could you tell me more about your load data for .284 Winchester ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For David Joe:<br />
Could you tell me more about your load data for .284 Winchester ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Joe</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/sierra-offers-new-ultra-high-bc-197gr-7mm-284-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-52027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59124#comment-52027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just left the 100 yard range testing them in the same 8 twist barrel that I use for EOL 195&#039;s.  They group just as expected through my .284 using H 1000, meaning just like the other heavies.  Yes there is torque and recoil, and lighter bullets group slightly better at 100 yards.  But these days long range matches are almost exclusively from 1,000 yards and shooting the heaviest bullets in 2016 I think helped me get HM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just left the 100 yard range testing them in the same 8 twist barrel that I use for EOL 195&#8217;s.  They group just as expected through my .284 using H 1000, meaning just like the other heavies.  Yes there is torque and recoil, and lighter bullets group slightly better at 100 yards.  But these days long range matches are almost exclusively from 1,000 yards and shooting the heaviest bullets in 2016 I think helped me get HM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy4064</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/sierra-offers-new-ultra-high-bc-197gr-7mm-284-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-52012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guy4064]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59124#comment-52012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Im sure to see this bullet on the line during LR matches in 7mm short mag]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im sure to see this bullet on the line during LR matches in 7mm short mag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/sierra-offers-new-ultra-high-bc-197gr-7mm-284-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-52011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59124#comment-52011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These would be awesome in a 300 Norma magnum case necked down to 7mm. Such as the 284 Piper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These would be awesome in a 300 Norma magnum case necked down to 7mm. Such as the 284 Piper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo Guss</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/sierra-offers-new-ultra-high-bc-197gr-7mm-284-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-52010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bo Guss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59124#comment-52010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus they could have forgotten about trans sonic and subsonic behavior and made a shorter boat tail, maybe they would have worked in a standard 8&quot; twist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus they could have forgotten about trans sonic and subsonic behavior and made a shorter boat tail, maybe they would have worked in a standard 8&#8243; twist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo Guss</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/sierra-offers-new-ultra-high-bc-197gr-7mm-284-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-52009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bo Guss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59124#comment-52009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would have been a breakthrough had it been lighter than the previous 183 grainer. No wonder the bc is boosted with such a high sectional density.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would have been a breakthrough had it been lighter than the previous 183 grainer. No wonder the bc is boosted with such a high sectional density.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/sierra-offers-new-ultra-high-bc-197gr-7mm-284-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-52007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59124#comment-52007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it is too heavy for calibre again (like the new 6mm offering). Fast twist barrel and heavy projectile equals a lot of torque on the bags or in your hands and translates to fliers.  

A lot of internet experts will say hooray for the figures but never shoot competitively or will be disappointed in their real world results.  This is a specialised bullet for specialist shooting and the equipment needed will be niche.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is too heavy for calibre again (like the new 6mm offering). Fast twist barrel and heavy projectile equals a lot of torque on the bags or in your hands and translates to fliers.  </p>
<p>A lot of internet experts will say hooray for the figures but never shoot competitively or will be disappointed in their real world results.  This is a specialised bullet for specialist shooting and the equipment needed will be niche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurz</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/sierra-offers-new-ultra-high-bc-197gr-7mm-284-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-52006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59124#comment-52006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I needed some coffee before I read this...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I needed some coffee before I read this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Joe</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/sierra-offers-new-ultra-high-bc-197gr-7mm-284-matchking/comment-page-1/#comment-52005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59124#comment-52005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Factory pointing is a very nice offering and I don&#039;t know any shooters that have thought, if they tried it, that they could improve on Sierra&#039;s performance by retipping.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Factory pointing is a very nice offering and I don&#8217;t know any shooters that have thought, if they tried it, that they could improve on Sierra&#8217;s performance by retipping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
