<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Army Adopts SIG XM17 (P320) Pistol to Replace Beretta M9</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/u-s-army-adopts-sig-xm17-p320-pistol-to-replace-beretta-m9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/u-s-army-adopts-sig-xm17-p320-pistol-to-replace-beretta-m9/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Team dagger</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/u-s-army-adopts-sig-xm17-p320-pistol-to-replace-beretta-m9/comment-page-1/#comment-52099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team dagger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 23:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59194#comment-52099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was wrong with the 1911?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was wrong with the 1911?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Joe</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/u-s-army-adopts-sig-xm17-p320-pistol-to-replace-beretta-m9/comment-page-1/#comment-52064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2017 00:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59194#comment-52064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My understanding is that all of these polymer handgun frames are fairly similar to nylon.  I don&#039;t doubt that they work well enough for some specified service life, but I can&#039;t envision an armory containing viable, decades old polymer pistols that were frequently used.  Gingerly used polymer pistols might seem to defy the stereotypes of other plastics, but imagine the proposition of making say, handcuffs, out of polymer instead of steel, and offering these to policemen.  There would be protests. It&#039;s an inherently soft material.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding is that all of these polymer handgun frames are fairly similar to nylon.  I don&#8217;t doubt that they work well enough for some specified service life, but I can&#8217;t envision an armory containing viable, decades old polymer pistols that were frequently used.  Gingerly used polymer pistols might seem to defy the stereotypes of other plastics, but imagine the proposition of making say, handcuffs, out of polymer instead of steel, and offering these to policemen.  There would be protests. It&#8217;s an inherently soft material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/u-s-army-adopts-sig-xm17-p320-pistol-to-replace-beretta-m9/comment-page-1/#comment-52059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 21:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59194#comment-52059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having owned &amp; fired both polymer and all metal handguns in my 67 years , I can see very little difference between them . Both in accuracy , and stability or strength . My Glocks are just as accurate as my H&amp;K 9mm , or my Dad&#039;s Hi-Standard &amp; Colt target pistols . Watch the Glock torture tests , and tell me you&#039;d do that to your Kimber or any other &quot;Range Queen&quot;. . Then prove it .....

  &quot;Me thinks thou does protest to much&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having owned &amp; fired both polymer and all metal handguns in my 67 years , I can see very little difference between them . Both in accuracy , and stability or strength . My Glocks are just as accurate as my H&amp;K 9mm , or my Dad&#8217;s Hi-Standard &amp; Colt target pistols . Watch the Glock torture tests , and tell me you&#8217;d do that to your Kimber or any other &#8220;Range Queen&#8221;. . Then prove it &#8230;..</p>
<p>  &#8220;Me thinks thou does protest to much&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/u-s-army-adopts-sig-xm17-p320-pistol-to-replace-beretta-m9/comment-page-1/#comment-52051</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 07:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59194#comment-52051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and new war is comming up in the world...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and new war is comming up in the world&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commenter1</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/u-s-army-adopts-sig-xm17-p320-pistol-to-replace-beretta-m9/comment-page-1/#comment-52048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[commenter1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59194#comment-52048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the rail is unreinforced polymer, that will end up being a problem. (for those who need a rail, not for most users as they will never utilize it)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the rail is unreinforced polymer, that will end up being a problem. (for those who need a rail, not for most users as they will never utilize it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Joe</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/u-s-army-adopts-sig-xm17-p320-pistol-to-replace-beretta-m9/comment-page-1/#comment-52037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 16:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59194#comment-52037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I fully appreciate the fact that polymer frames are nothing new in the world of pistols.   It has occurred to me though that when the same material and injection molding process is used for making rifle stocks, maufacturers rightly call such stocks their entry level stock, constituting the lowest end of the price range.  Handgun manufacturers don&#039;t seem to acknowledge the same, though.  Whether reinforced with hard points or not, this frame remains a plastic injection molded part.  Obviously the contract much have called for such, but it seems like a case of paying more for receiving less.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully appreciate the fact that polymer frames are nothing new in the world of pistols.   It has occurred to me though that when the same material and injection molding process is used for making rifle stocks, maufacturers rightly call such stocks their entry level stock, constituting the lowest end of the price range.  Handgun manufacturers don&#8217;t seem to acknowledge the same, though.  Whether reinforced with hard points or not, this frame remains a plastic injection molded part.  Obviously the contract much have called for such, but it seems like a case of paying more for receiving less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
