<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PRS Gas Gun Match &#8212; Season Opener in Florida</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/02/prs-gas-gun-match-season-opener-in-florida/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/02/prs-gas-gun-match-season-opener-in-florida/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Shaw</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/02/prs-gas-gun-match-season-opener-in-florida/comment-page-1/#comment-52250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry Shaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59345#comment-52250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Short Range vs. Long Range
The .223/5.56 guns had some lag time waiting on shot impacts. I believe the long-term solution may be to find a light and fast load for closer stages for near-instant reaction time and use a heavy load for the long shots to see splash and get the target to move a little more. &quot;

Really?  I just did a little checking with the JBM calculator and the Hornady loading manual.  Assuming you&#039;re running a 55 grain VMAX with a (max allowable) muzzle velocity of 3000 fps your bullet gets to 100 yards about .009 seconds faster than a 75 grain BTHP launched at 2700 fps.
So you might gain about one hundredth of a second per round by running a faster lighter bullet.  Over 20 shots that&#039;s around .2 seconds.  I doubt I could detect that .01 second per shot difference.
Call me crazy but there should be easier ways to make up less than a quarter of a second over the course of a match than to carry two different kinds of ammo just for this purpose.

Editor: What I think Sean was saying is that the lighter bullets were not rocking the distant steel targets enough, or displaying enough splash... hence time was lost confirming a &quot;hit&quot;. I think he&#039;s saying continue to use light bullets close, and heavier bullets far.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Short Range vs. Long Range<br />
The .223/5.56 guns had some lag time waiting on shot impacts. I believe the long-term solution may be to find a light and fast load for closer stages for near-instant reaction time and use a heavy load for the long shots to see splash and get the target to move a little more. &#8221;</p>
<p>Really?  I just did a little checking with the JBM calculator and the Hornady loading manual.  Assuming you&#8217;re running a 55 grain VMAX with a (max allowable) muzzle velocity of 3000 fps your bullet gets to 100 yards about .009 seconds faster than a 75 grain BTHP launched at 2700 fps.<br />
So you might gain about one hundredth of a second per round by running a faster lighter bullet.  Over 20 shots that&#8217;s around .2 seconds.  I doubt I could detect that .01 second per shot difference.<br />
Call me crazy but there should be easier ways to make up less than a quarter of a second over the course of a match than to carry two different kinds of ammo just for this purpose.</p>
<p>Editor: What I think Sean was saying is that the lighter bullets were not rocking the distant steel targets enough, or displaying enough splash&#8230; hence time was lost confirming a &#8220;hit&#8221;. I think he&#8217;s saying continue to use light bullets close, and heavier bullets far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
