Also, wanted to add that the reticle in first focal plane is very useful as I can range distance using the mill scale and still use MOA for my hold offs (MOA version both in reticle and clicks). I think S&B identified shooters like myself who are more comfortable with MOA yet find it easier to range targets using Radians. But I do find that S&B did a poor job explaining their reticle as the instruction manual provides no example information on its use. They clearly expect the user to have a very comprehensive understanding of mils and minutes.

Please explain the difference between 64 MOA “Elevation Adjustment” and 106 MOA “Total Internal Elevation” and, likewise, between +/- 16 MOA “Windage Adjustment” and 106 MOA “Total Internal Windage”. I found nothing about 106 anything on the S&B site. Thanks.

They are good scopes, but I’ve seen PMII’s fail on a military rifle before during normal range use. It’s price point is more expensive than the Nightforce ATACR and the Vortex Gen2 Razor HD. I would think one would need to evaluate all the scopes with those capabilities together to make such a definitive exclamation.

Schmidt & Bender produced and provided that video.

Please explain the difference between 64 MOA “Elevation Adjustment” and 106 MOA “Total Internal Elevation” and, likewise, between +/- 16 MOA “Windage Adjustment” and 106 MOA “Total Internal Windage”. I found nothing about 106 anything on the S&B site. Thanks.

Editor: The video was created by Schmidt & Bender. It has not been released on the S&B website yet. It is brand new and was provided to AccurateShooter.com and RifleShooter.com.