<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6.5 Creedmoor Load Data from Nosler</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/07/6-5-creedmoor-load-data-from-nosler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/07/6-5-creedmoor-load-data-from-nosler/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvin Foust</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/07/6-5-creedmoor-load-data-from-nosler/comment-page-1/#comment-59415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alvin Foust]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 01:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59843#comment-59415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So if a 6.5 Creedmoor works best with medium and medium slow-burning powders but yet Nosler shows all four of their most accurate powders are all faster burning, could you explain a little further please. Accuracy is my goal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if a 6.5 Creedmoor works best with medium and medium slow-burning powders but yet Nosler shows all four of their most accurate powders are all faster burning, could you explain a little further please. Accuracy is my goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
