<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chess Set for Firearm Fans &#8212; Now That&#8217;s A Cool Concept</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/09/chess-set-for-firearm-fans-now-thats-a-cool-concept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/09/chess-set-for-firearm-fans-now-thats-a-cool-concept/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banger</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/09/chess-set-for-firearm-fans-now-thats-a-cool-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-53549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Banger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 21:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54745#comment-53549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to have this image as my desktop background, until one day I noticed the pawn in front of the knight in the bottom corner doesn&#039;t have a casing- it is just a really long bullet. Took me forever to notice since you can&#039;t see much of it behind the shotgun shell rook. Couldn&#039;t un-see it after that, and had to change my background to preserve my sanity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to have this image as my desktop background, until one day I noticed the pawn in front of the knight in the bottom corner doesn&#8217;t have a casing- it is just a really long bullet. Took me forever to notice since you can&#8217;t see much of it behind the shotgun shell rook. Couldn&#8217;t un-see it after that, and had to change my background to preserve my sanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tm6</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/09/chess-set-for-firearm-fans-now-thats-a-cool-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-44810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tm6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2014 16:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54745#comment-44810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When playing with pieces that aren&#039;t shaped as classic pieces the height of the back row should slope down from the king/queen down thru the rook.

So the king &amp; queen would be the first and second tallest, then the bishops being third tallest, the Knight fourth, and the rook fifth (and hopefully shaped in some kind of tower shape). When playing with non-representative pieces it is a lot easier to rely on the height of the piece to tell them what they are. 

Answer to question: the dark king and queen should be switched in the photo above. The queen should always be placed on the square that matches her side (black on black square, white on white square)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When playing with pieces that aren&#8217;t shaped as classic pieces the height of the back row should slope down from the king/queen down thru the rook.</p>
<p>So the king &amp; queen would be the first and second tallest, then the bishops being third tallest, the Knight fourth, and the rook fifth (and hopefully shaped in some kind of tower shape). When playing with non-representative pieces it is a lot easier to rely on the height of the piece to tell them what they are. </p>
<p>Answer to question: the dark king and queen should be switched in the photo above. The queen should always be placed on the square that matches her side (black on black square, white on white square)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
