<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside Chamfer Tools &#8212; Sorting Through the Options</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/01/inside-chamfer-tools-sorting-through-the-options/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/01/inside-chamfer-tools-sorting-through-the-options/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene D</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/01/inside-chamfer-tools-sorting-through-the-options/comment-page-1/#comment-54194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gene D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59091#comment-54194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I looked at most of the de-burring and chamfering tools currently on the market when I needed to replace my very old , worn out tools . I chose to go with the Lyman because every one of them has a excellent &quot;soft&quot; handle , and the cutters , chamfer tools thread into the handle and that makes them replaceable with a carbide up-grade .Looked like the best value for the buck to me . But my twenty-five year old Wilson torpedo type 45 degree tool is still chugging along .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked at most of the de-burring and chamfering tools currently on the market when I needed to replace my very old , worn out tools . I chose to go with the Lyman because every one of them has a excellent &#8220;soft&#8221; handle , and the cutters , chamfer tools thread into the handle and that makes them replaceable with a carbide up-grade .Looked like the best value for the buck to me . But my twenty-five year old Wilson torpedo type 45 degree tool is still chugging along .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/01/inside-chamfer-tools-sorting-through-the-options/comment-page-1/#comment-54185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 17:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59091#comment-54185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Use an aluminum oxide tapered cone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use an aluminum oxide tapered cone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GREG</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/01/inside-chamfer-tools-sorting-through-the-options/comment-page-1/#comment-51979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GREG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59091#comment-51979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wilson micrometer case trimmer has an optional part for chamfering after trimming.  Its 100% precise too when used correctly.  Makes each case exactly the same.  No worry of chamfering deeper or shallower...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wilson micrometer case trimmer has an optional part for chamfering after trimming.  Its 100% precise too when used correctly.  Makes each case exactly the same.  No worry of chamfering deeper or shallower&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELR Researcher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/01/inside-chamfer-tools-sorting-through-the-options/comment-page-1/#comment-51966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ELR Researcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 19:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59091#comment-51966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlie Mac - you missed the key element, &quot;with handles&quot;.  Burrs typically have a 1/4&quot; shank to be used in a drill motor. The Lyman is embedded into the handle and the Redding is a screw-in.  I have a call into Brownells/Sinclair to find out the shaft diameter for their handle - which, regrettably, is hard plastic, not soft/ergo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie Mac &#8211; you missed the key element, &#8220;with handles&#8221;.  Burrs typically have a 1/4&#8243; shank to be used in a drill motor. The Lyman is embedded into the handle and the Redding is a screw-in.  I have a call into Brownells/Sinclair to find out the shaft diameter for their handle &#8211; which, regrettably, is hard plastic, not soft/ergo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Fakenbridge</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/01/inside-chamfer-tools-sorting-through-the-options/comment-page-1/#comment-51963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Fakenbridge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 17:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59091#comment-51963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I am a fan of K&amp;M products in general. The chamfering tool just plain sucks. Very poor design and very easy to ruin good cases. I would use anything else before using this tool.

Paul]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am a fan of K&amp;M products in general. The chamfering tool just plain sucks. Very poor design and very easy to ruin good cases. I would use anything else before using this tool.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Mac</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/01/inside-chamfer-tools-sorting-through-the-options/comment-page-1/#comment-51961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Mac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 02:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59091#comment-51961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://www.mcmaster.com/#43035A86 Single Cut Carbide Bur with 1/4&quot; Diameter Shank, Tapered Cone-Radius End, 1-3/16&quot; Cut Length Head Diameter 5/8&quot; &gt;&gt; McMaster-Carr has everything]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.mcmaster.com/#43035A86" rel="nofollow">https://www.mcmaster.com/#43035A86</a> Single Cut Carbide Bur with 1/4&#8243; Diameter Shank, Tapered Cone-Radius End, 1-3/16&#8243; Cut Length Head Diameter 5/8&#8243; &gt;&gt; McMaster-Carr has everything</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELR Researcher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/01/inside-chamfer-tools-sorting-through-the-options/comment-page-1/#comment-51958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ELR Researcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2017 18:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=59091#comment-51958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regrettably, none of the tools with handles support .50 cal. Market opportunity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regrettably, none of the tools with handles support .50 cal. Market opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
