<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Slice of (Barrel) Life &#8212; Inside Look at Barrel Erosion</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/02/a-slice-of-barrel-life-inside-look-at-barrel-erosion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/02/a-slice-of-barrel-life-inside-look-at-barrel-erosion/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lawson</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/02/a-slice-of-barrel-life-inside-look-at-barrel-erosion/comment-page-1/#comment-54455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Lawson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2018 09:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56695#comment-54455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am shooting a .308 match grade Australian Maddco barrel. At 4,500 rounds it is as accurate as the day I installed it.

EDITOR: Glad you are getting that kind of barrel life. Not unheard-of with the .308 Win catridge. However, you may want to start saving for a new tube. We have seen many cases where .308 Win barrels really lose accuracy between 4000-5000 rounds. It has happened to some notable F-TR shooters and Palma shooters. Recently at the SWN a well-known Lady sling shooter told us that he rifle was starting to toss shots -- it &#039;opened up badly&#039;. When we asked the round count, she abashedly said &quot;Over 4000, maybe closer to 5000. I know, I know... I thought I could get one more match out of it. But it&#039;s toast now.&quot;

If you&#039;re just shootin&#039; steel for fun, no reason to pull a barrel that might still deliver 0.7 moa. But if you are shooting matches, it&#039;s unlikely (not impossible) but unlikely the top-level accuracy will hold past 4500. YMMV.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am shooting a .308 match grade Australian Maddco barrel. At 4,500 rounds it is as accurate as the day I installed it.</p>
<p>EDITOR: Glad you are getting that kind of barrel life. Not unheard-of with the .308 Win catridge. However, you may want to start saving for a new tube. We have seen many cases where .308 Win barrels really lose accuracy between 4000-5000 rounds. It has happened to some notable F-TR shooters and Palma shooters. Recently at the SWN a well-known Lady sling shooter told us that he rifle was starting to toss shots &#8212; it &#8216;opened up badly&#8217;. When we asked the round count, she abashedly said &#8220;Over 4000, maybe closer to 5000. I know, I know&#8230; I thought I could get one more match out of it. But it&#8217;s toast now.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re just shootin&#8217; steel for fun, no reason to pull a barrel that might still deliver 0.7 moa. But if you are shooting matches, it&#8217;s unlikely (not impossible) but unlikely the top-level accuracy will hold past 4500. YMMV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/02/a-slice-of-barrel-life-inside-look-at-barrel-erosion/comment-page-1/#comment-53548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56695#comment-53548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you recall how many rounds went downrange before you DX&#039;d the barrel?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you recall how many rounds went downrange before you DX&#8217;d the barrel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/02/a-slice-of-barrel-life-inside-look-at-barrel-erosion/comment-page-1/#comment-48208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56695#comment-48208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ive never had one stop shooting before the throat was out .100 or more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive never had one stop shooting before the throat was out .100 or more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/02/a-slice-of-barrel-life-inside-look-at-barrel-erosion/comment-page-1/#comment-48206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56695#comment-48206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder how much of the erosion could have been seen using a borescope? I&#039;m debating the purchase of a borescope for all it can reveal. This (using borescope) may be a way of determining how much to set back a barrel after it has eroded like this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much of the erosion could have been seen using a borescope? I&#8217;m debating the purchase of a borescope for all it can reveal. This (using borescope) may be a way of determining how much to set back a barrel after it has eroded like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geno</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/02/a-slice-of-barrel-life-inside-look-at-barrel-erosion/comment-page-1/#comment-48202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geno]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56695#comment-48202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My BR smith told me no problem cutting a new chamber to do a set back.  Whether it is advisable depends on how much fire cracking remains in the rest of the bore.   His opinion is that (in a 6ppc) I can expect to get maybe 600-900 accurate rounds after the rechamber.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My BR smith told me no problem cutting a new chamber to do a set back.  Whether it is advisable depends on how much fire cracking remains in the rest of the bore.   His opinion is that (in a 6ppc) I can expect to get maybe 600-900 accurate rounds after the rechamber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick brungard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/02/a-slice-of-barrel-life-inside-look-at-barrel-erosion/comment-page-1/#comment-48200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nick brungard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56695#comment-48200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I first heard about throat erosion when i bought a custom built 6ppc from clarence hammonds. A superbly accurate rifle but only for a limited round count. He said cutting it back would extend its barrel life. While i understand what erosion is and what cutting it back does. I dont understand why erosion effects accuracy so much. Its obvious it does so im not arguing that. Its just one of those thing i cant wrap my fingers around y.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first heard about throat erosion when i bought a custom built 6ppc from clarence hammonds. A superbly accurate rifle but only for a limited round count. He said cutting it back would extend its barrel life. While i understand what erosion is and what cutting it back does. I dont understand why erosion effects accuracy so much. Its obvious it does so im not arguing that. Its just one of those thing i cant wrap my fingers around y.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
