Comments on: .224 Valkyrie Load Data for 52gr to 95gr Bullets from Sierra https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/03/224-valkyrie-load-data-for-52gr-to-95gr-bullets/ from AccurateShooter.com Fri, 10 Apr 2026 17:43:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26 By: M9Powell https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/03/224-valkyrie-load-data-for-52gr-to-95gr-bullets/comment-page-1/#comment-55940 Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:32:12 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=60992#comment-55940 I’m waiting on my first Army retirement check too come in. I’m thinking about buying a LWRC 224 Valkrie when it gets here. The cool thing about it is it uses a larger Magwell than std GI & corresponding larger promag.

]]> By: M9Powell https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/03/224-valkyrie-load-data-for-52gr-to-95gr-bullets/comment-page-1/#comment-55939 Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:25:54 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=60992#comment-55939 A GI mag won’t work beyond 2 or 3 rds anyway. You need a 6.8 SPC mag for this. The good ones are the aforementioned steel from PRI.

]]> By: M9Powell https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/03/224-valkyrie-load-data-for-52gr-to-95gr-bullets/comment-page-1/#comment-55937 Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:18:07 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=60992#comment-55937 I have no clue what length the Valkyrie chamber will accept a 95 SMK at but the 2.260″ length is based on what a thick-walled aluminum GI mag will accept. There are thinner walled steel mags available that will accept 2.290-2.300″ .

]]> By: Kris https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/03/224-valkyrie-load-data-for-52gr-to-95gr-bullets/comment-page-1/#comment-55094 Wed, 02 May 2018 14:13:54 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=60992#comment-55094 Nevermind,they made the case length 0.02 shorter than everyone else lists to fit it in. Lol!

]]> By: Kris https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/03/224-valkyrie-load-data-for-52gr-to-95gr-bullets/comment-page-1/#comment-55093 Wed, 02 May 2018 14:11:39 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=60992#comment-55093 According to Sierra, the ogive on the 95 SMK is 0.661 nominal. If the case is 1.620, then loading it to 2.260 puts the ogive below the case mouth…

]]> By: Dacian Halmagean https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/03/224-valkyrie-load-data-for-52gr-to-95gr-bullets/comment-page-1/#comment-54818 Sat, 31 Mar 2018 03:36:16 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=60992#comment-54818 Oh man Fal you might be on to something!

]]> By: FAL https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/03/224-valkyrie-load-data-for-52gr-to-95gr-bullets/comment-page-1/#comment-54772 Fri, 23 Mar 2018 18:59:28 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=60992#comment-54772 Will a 223 AI feed reliably in an AR15?

Are there any AR15 uppers or even barrels for 22 PPC?

Can you find a barrel for a 22-250 with an 8 inch twist?

]]> By: Al Baker https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/03/224-valkyrie-load-data-for-52gr-to-95gr-bullets/comment-page-1/#comment-54746 Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:28:15 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=60992#comment-54746 For when the 22-250 just ain’t enough….err, wait….

]]> By: Grimstod https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/03/224-valkyrie-load-data-for-52gr-to-95gr-bullets/comment-page-1/#comment-54745 Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:00:16 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=60992#comment-54745 22 PPC does better on performance. Almost 100fps faster to.

]]> By: GG https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/03/224-valkyrie-load-data-for-52gr-to-95gr-bullets/comment-page-1/#comment-54739 Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:30:33 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=60992#comment-54739 Looks nearly identical to the .223 Ackley Improved.

]]>