<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NEW T/C LRR Chassis Rifle for PRS and Tactical Competition</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/new-tc-lrr-chassis-rifle-for-prs-and-tactical-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/new-tc-lrr-chassis-rifle-for-prs-and-tactical-competition/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:31:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/new-tc-lrr-chassis-rifle-for-prs-and-tactical-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-55140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 11:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61189#comment-55140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nah, that is the 6 mm Winchester :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, that is the 6 mm Winchester <img src="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maddox</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/new-tc-lrr-chassis-rifle-for-prs-and-tactical-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-55132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 00:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61189#comment-55132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1 in 10&quot;? Come on! Is it the Return of the .244 Remington?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 in 10&#8243;? Come on! Is it the Return of the .244 Remington?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/new-tc-lrr-chassis-rifle-for-prs-and-tactical-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-55125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2018 23:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61189#comment-55125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This should have been a good excuse to bring back the icon/warlord action.  I agree on the 6mm twist rate, what a joke.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should have been a good excuse to bring back the icon/warlord action.  I agree on the 6mm twist rate, what a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Bunn</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/new-tc-lrr-chassis-rifle-for-prs-and-tactical-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-55124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derrick Bunn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2018 18:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61189#comment-55124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[.243 in - 1-10 twist?

Have we not moved on in the last 10 years? The RPR had a 1-7.7 if my old memory serves me well. With so many &quot;long range&quot; (high BC) projectiles in 6mm needing faster twist barrels, T/C could have done better here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.243 in &#8211; 1-10 twist?</p>
<p>Have we not moved on in the last 10 years? The RPR had a 1-7.7 if my old memory serves me well. With so many &#8220;long range&#8221; (high BC) projectiles in 6mm needing faster twist barrels, T/C could have done better here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
