<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trijicon 5-50x56mm Long Range Scope &#8212; New and Powerful</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/trijicon-5-50x56mm-long-range-scope-new-and-powerful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/trijicon-5-50x56mm-long-range-scope-new-and-powerful/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/trijicon-5-50x56mm-long-range-scope-new-and-powerful/comment-page-1/#comment-57847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61223#comment-57847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m interested in what this scope has to offer on a .338 Lapua mag. If I get one I&#039;ll be sure to come back and give it a review.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested in what this scope has to offer on a .338 Lapua mag. If I get one I&#8217;ll be sure to come back and give it a review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/trijicon-5-50x56mm-long-range-scope-new-and-powerful/comment-page-1/#comment-57355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61223#comment-57355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s unfortunate there aren&#039;t any reviews of this scope, I&#039;m in the market (but want MRAD) and don&#039;t want to buy the Golden Eagle &amp; switch to MOA. There was a lengthy review on THE TRUTH ABOUT GUNS by Kat Ainsworth, but I&#039;m not completely sold that she&#039;s an experienced longrange shooter who can discern the differences between good glass &amp; excellent glass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate there aren&#8217;t any reviews of this scope, I&#8217;m in the market (but want MRAD) and don&#8217;t want to buy the Golden Eagle &amp; switch to MOA. There was a lengthy review on THE TRUTH ABOUT GUNS by Kat Ainsworth, but I&#8217;m not completely sold that she&#8217;s an experienced longrange shooter who can discern the differences between good glass &amp; excellent glass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry French</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/trijicon-5-50x56mm-long-range-scope-new-and-powerful/comment-page-1/#comment-55169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry French]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61223#comment-55169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would love to try this out on my Ruger Precision 308 at a thousand yards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to try this out on my Ruger Precision 308 at a thousand yards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soft on</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/trijicon-5-50x56mm-long-range-scope-new-and-powerful/comment-page-1/#comment-55165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soft on]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 13:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61223#comment-55165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why 5 power?  What ya shooting at in a class bench rest comp with 5 power..  why won&#039;t someone make a 20×50. To far of a spread between low and high power... a bison at 1000 yards on 50 power probably looks like an old toaster oven...   yuuuuck.. especially for the $ double yuuuck

Editor: Five power might be useful for a varminter or a tactical shooter, but they would probably be interested in the 4.5-30X Trijicon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why 5 power?  What ya shooting at in a class bench rest comp with 5 power..  why won&#8217;t someone make a 20×50. To far of a spread between low and high power&#8230; a bison at 1000 yards on 50 power probably looks like an old toaster oven&#8230;   yuuuuck.. especially for the $ double yuuuck</p>
<p>Editor: Five power might be useful for a varminter or a tactical shooter, but they would probably be interested in the 4.5-30X Trijicon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/trijicon-5-50x56mm-long-range-scope-new-and-powerful/comment-page-1/#comment-55164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 11:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61223#comment-55164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confused why this is only being offered as a Second Focal Plane scope.  Makes the MOA or Mil reticle useless except at on magnification on the band, but if it were FFP the subtensions would be useable at all mags. Is that an error in the article, or a mistake by trijicon?

Editor: These high-magnification scopes are used almost exclusively in disciplines/applications where you are shooting at known distances, so ranging is irrelevant. Also, most competition shooters don&#039;t want a reticle that gets thick at high magnification. In terms of wind hold-off, having the precise MOA is available at 40X, or you can just hold to a specific ring, which is a fixed MOA from center. Trijicon probably noticed that almost nobody has asked for a FFP 50X scope. The MIL version does have wind hold-off marks. See bottom graphic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confused why this is only being offered as a Second Focal Plane scope.  Makes the MOA or Mil reticle useless except at on magnification on the band, but if it were FFP the subtensions would be useable at all mags. Is that an error in the article, or a mistake by trijicon?</p>
<p>Editor: These high-magnification scopes are used almost exclusively in disciplines/applications where you are shooting at known distances, so ranging is irrelevant. Also, most competition shooters don&#8217;t want a reticle that gets thick at high magnification. In terms of wind hold-off, having the precise MOA is available at 40X, or you can just hold to a specific ring, which is a fixed MOA from center. Trijicon probably noticed that almost nobody has asked for a FFP 50X scope. The MIL version does have wind hold-off marks. See bottom graphic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/05/trijicon-5-50x56mm-long-range-scope-new-and-powerful/comment-page-1/#comment-55163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 11:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61223#comment-55163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10× zoom... very bad for clearity. nightfoce has 3,7×

clicks are good at trijicon?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10× zoom&#8230; very bad for clearity. nightfoce has 3,7×</p>
<p>clicks are good at trijicon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
