<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ammo Insights: The 6.5&#215;55 Swedish Cartridge</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/07/ammo-insights-the-6-5x55-swedish-cartridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/07/ammo-insights-the-6-5x55-swedish-cartridge/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/07/ammo-insights-the-6-5x55-swedish-cartridge/comment-page-1/#comment-55635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 21:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61504#comment-55635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well yes and no.  The OAL of the cartridge does require a mid length action if you want to load 140s plus to a long length and use a magazine.

But the world has changed a lot since that was the rule of thumb and 100 to 130 grain bullets will fit into a 308 length magazine and feed through a Rem 700 SA.

So a bit of a rethink is needed here, instead of defaulting to the 1980s mantra we have grown so comfortable with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well yes and no.  The OAL of the cartridge does require a mid length action if you want to load 140s plus to a long length and use a magazine.</p>
<p>But the world has changed a lot since that was the rule of thumb and 100 to 130 grain bullets will fit into a 308 length magazine and feed through a Rem 700 SA.</p>
<p>So a bit of a rethink is needed here, instead of defaulting to the 1980s mantra we have grown so comfortable with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
