<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mother of All Rimfire Ammo Tests &#8212; AccurateReloading.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/the-mother-of-all-rimfire-ammo-tests-accuratereloading-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/the-mother-of-all-rimfire-ammo-tests-accuratereloading-com/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 11:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kinnori Konar</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/the-mother-of-all-rimfire-ammo-tests-accuratereloading-com/comment-page-1/#comment-57691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kinnori Konar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 12:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58840#comment-57691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interested for.22 rimfire ammunition test in walther KK 500 rifle]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interested for.22 rimfire ammunition test in walther KK 500 rifle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Giacomel</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/the-mother-of-all-rimfire-ammo-tests-accuratereloading-com/comment-page-1/#comment-55977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Giacomel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 08:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58840#comment-55977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would have been most 
helpful is the weight of each round
and the rim thickness. The rim sets the head spacing and the weight or grouping thereof indicates manufacturing consistency.
Using a scale, a rim thickness gauge and a mic I can turn cheap rounds into small piles of very consistent ammo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would have been most<br />
helpful is the weight of each round<br />
and the rim thickness. The rim sets the head spacing and the weight or grouping thereof indicates manufacturing consistency.<br />
Using a scale, a rim thickness gauge and a mic I can turn cheap rounds into small piles of very consistent ammo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/the-mother-of-all-rimfire-ammo-tests-accuratereloading-com/comment-page-1/#comment-55896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 23:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58840#comment-55896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of popular options missing from that list.

No Norma?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of popular options missing from that list.</p>
<p>No Norma?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/the-mother-of-all-rimfire-ammo-tests-accuratereloading-com/comment-page-1/#comment-53716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 21:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58840#comment-53716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have seen this test quoted over and over on-line and unfortunately some believe they will get similar results in their equipment.  The real take away from this should be that if someone is serious about rimfire accuracy that they need to test extensively to determine what works best.  Each rimfire rifle has its own personality and what works in one will not work in another.

The article also doesn&#039;t address the many variable that need to be considered - barrel age &amp; maintenance, action torque, barrel and bolt cleaning, firing pin spring age, among others.  

Bill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen this test quoted over and over on-line and unfortunately some believe they will get similar results in their equipment.  The real take away from this should be that if someone is serious about rimfire accuracy that they need to test extensively to determine what works best.  Each rimfire rifle has its own personality and what works in one will not work in another.</p>
<p>The article also doesn&#8217;t address the many variable that need to be considered &#8211; barrel age &amp; maintenance, action torque, barrel and bolt cleaning, firing pin spring age, among others.  </p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/the-mother-of-all-rimfire-ammo-tests-accuratereloading-com/comment-page-1/#comment-53712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58840#comment-53712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Winchester 52 with standard volisty target does better then that at 100yrds]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Winchester 52 with standard volisty target does better then that at 100yrds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELR Researcher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/the-mother-of-all-rimfire-ammo-tests-accuratereloading-com/comment-page-1/#comment-53707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ELR Researcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58840#comment-53707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read the review looking for when and how the tuner was implemented.  Here&#039;s what the shooter posted:

&quot;The rifle did not have this tuner on it originally.

A little while ao, a friend was playing around with it, trying to see how it might improve his groups.

Frankly, I would have preferred using teh rifle without it.

But, I am afraid I only noticed this fact after shooting quite a few groups.

We are debating doing the test again, without this tuner.&quot;

From that message it is impossible to tell which rounds &quot;benefited&quot; from the tuner (meaning that they took time to actually tune to the load).

I completely agree that the testing should have been done withOUT the tuner.

A couple of other things:

1. The test data are now 7 years old.  To assume that no changes have been made in the ammo during that span is IMHO making an ass out of u and me.
2. Given all the effort put in to do the testing, seems they would have benefited everyone if they had taken more time to place more stringent controls on the testing.  In particular standardizing of a retuirn-to-battery benchrest setup.
3. Butch Lambert in another AcccurateReloader thread posted this statement made by a world class 22 rimfire shooter he knows regarding how that shooter tests ammo.

&quot;Butch,

We do 95% of our ammo testing indoors. If you are trying to pick out a lot outdoors, there is just too much variation that the conditions add. Also, there are probably only 3-4 shooters in the US who can really tell anything about ammo testing with iron sights from the prone position. The rest of them are just guessing or blowing smoke. Initially we narrow down our lot selection out of a machine rest and pick out the best 5-6 lots. Then we test with a scope at 50m off a good rest, also indoors. This is also where I adjust my tuner. We further narrow our lot selection down to 2-3 best lots and then shoot them outdoors with iron sights. This is where we see if the ammo shoots in the wind or if it needs additional tuning. In my opinion there are only two of us at the AMU who can do this effectively. For us the whole process of ammo testing on a new barrel can last up to two weeks and 2000 rounds. If the barrel isn&#039;t up to snuff it will be a much shorter ammo test.

Good Luck,
Eric&quot;

My bottom line is to look at what the match winners shoot and...if you are really serious...implement the procedure noted just above.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the review looking for when and how the tuner was implemented.  Here&#8217;s what the shooter posted:</p>
<p>&#8220;The rifle did not have this tuner on it originally.</p>
<p>A little while ao, a friend was playing around with it, trying to see how it might improve his groups.</p>
<p>Frankly, I would have preferred using teh rifle without it.</p>
<p>But, I am afraid I only noticed this fact after shooting quite a few groups.</p>
<p>We are debating doing the test again, without this tuner.&#8221;</p>
<p>From that message it is impossible to tell which rounds &#8220;benefited&#8221; from the tuner (meaning that they took time to actually tune to the load).</p>
<p>I completely agree that the testing should have been done withOUT the tuner.</p>
<p>A couple of other things:</p>
<p>1. The test data are now 7 years old.  To assume that no changes have been made in the ammo during that span is IMHO making an ass out of u and me.<br />
2. Given all the effort put in to do the testing, seems they would have benefited everyone if they had taken more time to place more stringent controls on the testing.  In particular standardizing of a retuirn-to-battery benchrest setup.<br />
3. Butch Lambert in another AcccurateReloader thread posted this statement made by a world class 22 rimfire shooter he knows regarding how that shooter tests ammo.</p>
<p>&#8220;Butch,</p>
<p>We do 95% of our ammo testing indoors. If you are trying to pick out a lot outdoors, there is just too much variation that the conditions add. Also, there are probably only 3-4 shooters in the US who can really tell anything about ammo testing with iron sights from the prone position. The rest of them are just guessing or blowing smoke. Initially we narrow down our lot selection out of a machine rest and pick out the best 5-6 lots. Then we test with a scope at 50m off a good rest, also indoors. This is also where I adjust my tuner. We further narrow our lot selection down to 2-3 best lots and then shoot them outdoors with iron sights. This is where we see if the ammo shoots in the wind or if it needs additional tuning. In my opinion there are only two of us at the AMU who can do this effectively. For us the whole process of ammo testing on a new barrel can last up to two weeks and 2000 rounds. If the barrel isn&#8217;t up to snuff it will be a much shorter ammo test.</p>
<p>Good Luck,<br />
Eric&#8221;</p>
<p>My bottom line is to look at what the match winners shoot and&#8230;if you are really serious&#8230;implement the procedure noted just above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GG</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/the-mother-of-all-rimfire-ammo-tests-accuratereloading-com/comment-page-1/#comment-53706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 17:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58840#comment-53706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A nice list with Eley and Lapua dominating. Would have liked to see SK match tested. A great round at a reasonable price. In my rifle it shoots as well as Tenex in our 200Y prone matchs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice list with Eley and Lapua dominating. Would have liked to see SK match tested. A great round at a reasonable price. In my rifle it shoots as well as Tenex in our 200Y prone matchs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Litz</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/the-mother-of-all-rimfire-ammo-tests-accuratereloading-com/comment-page-1/#comment-51622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Litz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58840#comment-51622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would love to see this cross-referenced to the live fire testing I did!  My testing recorded Average and SD of MV&#039;s and BC&#039;s for 90 different rimfire ammo types (from 5 different barrels each) but did NOT include any precision (group) results.  I&#039;m sure all the ammo types aren&#039;t the same, but many of them are.  Would be awesome to see the two data sets combined.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see this cross-referenced to the live fire testing I did!  My testing recorded Average and SD of MV&#8217;s and BC&#8217;s for 90 different rimfire ammo types (from 5 different barrels each) but did NOT include any precision (group) results.  I&#8217;m sure all the ammo types aren&#8217;t the same, but many of them are.  Would be awesome to see the two data sets combined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rifle2</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/the-mother-of-all-rimfire-ammo-tests-accuratereloading-com/comment-page-1/#comment-51621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rifle2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58840#comment-51621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Western Value Pack, did surprisingly well for budget ammo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Western Value Pack, did surprisingly well for budget ammo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
