<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New &#8220;Assault Weapons&#8221; Ban Introduced in Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/new-assault-weapons-ban-introduced-in-congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/new-assault-weapons-ban-introduced-in-congress/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELR Researcher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/new-assault-weapons-ban-introduced-in-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-56434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ELR Researcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 01:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62082#comment-56434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The text has now been posted - see https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/s66/BILLS-116s66is.pdf

Very difficult to understand why &quot;APPENDIX A—FIREARMS EXEMPTED BY THE
ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN OF 2017&quot; does NOT include a generic description for firearms not listed but which do NOT include &quot;assault weapon&quot; features. There are literally thousands of supposedly (generically/by-feature)&quot;exempt&quot; firearms that are not listed, e.g. the Mossberg 590 shotgun. [Yes, APPENDIX lists bolt action, pump, lever and slide action rifles and shotguns - NO pistols or revolvers.]  Why isn&#039;t the exemption by specific feature set rather than list hundreds of makes and models.  What does that list actually do - restrict in some manner if NOT listed; especially since pistols, of any type, are not listed??? 

Also note that the included grandfather clause has an effective date of the date of legislation ENACTMENT, not some then-future implementation date. 

My bottom line, at this point, is that this bill, a SENATE bill, will VERY likely never get out of the Senate.  Actually, how is it that it was even heard in the Senate???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The text has now been posted &#8211; see <a href="https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/s66/BILLS-116s66is.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/s66/BILLS-116s66is.pdf</a></p>
<p>Very difficult to understand why &#8220;APPENDIX A—FIREARMS EXEMPTED BY THE<br />
ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN OF 2017&#8243; does NOT include a generic description for firearms not listed but which do NOT include &#8220;assault weapon&#8221; features. There are literally thousands of supposedly (generically/by-feature)&#8221;exempt&#8221; firearms that are not listed, e.g. the Mossberg 590 shotgun. [Yes, APPENDIX lists bolt action, pump, lever and slide action rifles and shotguns &#8211; NO pistols or revolvers.]  Why isn&#8217;t the exemption by specific feature set rather than list hundreds of makes and models.  What does that list actually do &#8211; restrict in some manner if NOT listed; especially since pistols, of any type, are not listed??? </p>
<p>Also note that the included grandfather clause has an effective date of the date of legislation ENACTMENT, not some then-future implementation date. </p>
<p>My bottom line, at this point, is that this bill, a SENATE bill, will VERY likely never get out of the Senate.  Actually, how is it that it was even heard in the Senate???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry malerba</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/new-assault-weapons-ban-introduced-in-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-56432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gerry malerba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62082#comment-56432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can,t you see
    they are commies&#039;&#039;  Not Dems
      It,s the swamp again same old people, on handgun control,s payroll]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can,t you see<br />
    they are commies&#8221;  Not Dems<br />
      It,s the swamp again same old people, on handgun control,s payroll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/new-assault-weapons-ban-introduced-in-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-56431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 01:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62082#comment-56431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just yesterday ,1/15/19, the new Brazilian president made firearms legal for citizens! What is happening to us?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just yesterday ,1/15/19, the new Brazilian president made firearms legal for citizens! What is happening to us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/new-assault-weapons-ban-introduced-in-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-56428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62082#comment-56428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fighting for freedom...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fighting for freedom&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene D</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/new-assault-weapons-ban-introduced-in-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-56427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gene D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 21:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62082#comment-56427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well .....As with the wonderful , fantastic ACA , which &quot;WE&quot; Demon-crats passed , &quot;WE&quot; have to pass it , so then , &quot;WE&quot; can read , and understand it ! You peons just sit quietly , while &quot;WE&quot; elitist strip you of your evil and un-necessary RIGHTS ! After all ; &quot;WE&quot; do know what&#039;s best for you !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8230;..As with the wonderful , fantastic ACA , which &#8220;WE&#8221; Demon-crats passed , &#8220;WE&#8221; have to pass it , so then , &#8220;WE&#8221; can read , and understand it ! You peons just sit quietly , while &#8220;WE&#8221; elitist strip you of your evil and un-necessary RIGHTS ! After all ; &#8220;WE&#8221; do know what&#8217;s best for you !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/new-assault-weapons-ban-introduced-in-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-56426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 18:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62082#comment-56426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feinstein is a prime example of why hair dye should be tested for toxicity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feinstein is a prime example of why hair dye should be tested for toxicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELR Researcher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/new-assault-weapons-ban-introduced-in-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-56425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ELR Researcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 18:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62082#comment-56425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;As of 01/15/2019 text has not been received for S.66&quot; - https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/66/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22S.66%22%5D%7D&amp;r=1&amp;s=4]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As of 01/15/2019 text has not been received for S.66&#8243; &#8211; <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/66/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22S.66%22%5D%7D&#038;r=1&#038;s=4" rel="nofollow">https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/66/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22S.66%22%5D%7D&#038;r=1&#038;s=4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
