<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Single-Stage Reloading Presses &#8212; Product Video Showcase</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/single-stage-reloading-presses-weekly-video-showcase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/single-stage-reloading-presses-weekly-video-showcase/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELR Researcher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/single-stage-reloading-presses-weekly-video-showcase/comment-page-1/#comment-56356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ELR Researcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2019 15:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62049#comment-56356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, unlike the Forster press, the Frankford press has NO priming capability - at least per the Midway &quot;specs&quot; comparing those two presses. Hopefully that Midway spec is wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, unlike the Forster press, the Frankford press has NO priming capability &#8211; at least per the Midway &#8220;specs&#8221; comparing those two presses. Hopefully that Midway spec is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Wynne</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/single-stage-reloading-presses-weekly-video-showcase/comment-page-1/#comment-56355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Wynne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2019 14:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62049#comment-56355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an engineer, I would argue the Hornady press is not a true O-frame press, as the near and far sides of the &quot;O&quot; do not straddle the ram boring.  It is a C-press with the spine split into two risers and spread out for improved rigidity.  It looks like a good, rigid design, but is a C-press at its core.  Take a profile photo from the side with one riser obscuring the other to see this.

Editor: Good analysis. That&#039;s why we called the Hornady press a &quot;Pyramid-style&quot; press in contrast to an O-frame. But in reality it&#039;s missing one side of the three-sided pyramid. It does seem beefy enough, and we like the slots on the top for dies and tools.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an engineer, I would argue the Hornady press is not a true O-frame press, as the near and far sides of the &#8220;O&#8221; do not straddle the ram boring.  It is a C-press with the spine split into two risers and spread out for improved rigidity.  It looks like a good, rigid design, but is a C-press at its core.  Take a profile photo from the side with one riser obscuring the other to see this.</p>
<p>Editor: Good analysis. That&#8217;s why we called the Hornady press a &#8220;Pyramid-style&#8221; press in contrast to an O-frame. But in reality it&#8217;s missing one side of the three-sided pyramid. It does seem beefy enough, and we like the slots on the top for dies and tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
