<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bargain-Finder 188: AccurateShooter&#8217;s Deals of the Week</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/04/bargain-finder-188-accurateshooters-deals-of-the-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/04/bargain-finder-188-accurateshooters-deals-of-the-week/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy james</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/04/bargain-finder-188-accurateshooters-deals-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-57062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy james]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 13:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62512#comment-57062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While that is a heckuva deal on that 4-12 nikon, it has the worst parallax i have ever seen in a scope...period.

Editor: Your comment is surprising, I suspect maybe you were not using the scope for its intended purpose (hunting inside 400 yards). People should read the reviews from actual buyers on Amazon. Reviews HERE: https://amzn.to/2GGLXee

The scope earned a 4.5 star rating with 365 reviews, most of which are extremely positive. Here are two examples: 

&quot;Best Scope for the money. The Glass is Clear. Quality is Great. The BDC is Spot-On. The Spot-On app works amazing with this scope. I later purchased a 4-16 scope made by another company. It can&#039;t TOUCH this Buckmaster scope.&quot;

&quot;As an avid hunter and retired military man who depended on a good scope, this is simply the best bang for the buck. Clear optics, holds center, easy to use, light weight (which concerned me at first as it seemed a bit cheaply made) and &#039;Zeroing&#039; setup makes this a great buy. I recommend this scope over many more expensive ones I own. Leave it to Nikon to make an affordable useful scope. Thank you!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While that is a heckuva deal on that 4-12 nikon, it has the worst parallax i have ever seen in a scope&#8230;period.</p>
<p>Editor: Your comment is surprising, I suspect maybe you were not using the scope for its intended purpose (hunting inside 400 yards). People should read the reviews from actual buyers on Amazon. Reviews HERE: <a href="https://amzn.to/2GGLXee" rel="nofollow">https://amzn.to/2GGLXee</a></p>
<p>The scope earned a 4.5 star rating with 365 reviews, most of which are extremely positive. Here are two examples: </p>
<p>&#8220;Best Scope for the money. The Glass is Clear. Quality is Great. The BDC is Spot-On. The Spot-On app works amazing with this scope. I later purchased a 4-16 scope made by another company. It can&#8217;t TOUCH this Buckmaster scope.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;As an avid hunter and retired military man who depended on a good scope, this is simply the best bang for the buck. Clear optics, holds center, easy to use, light weight (which concerned me at first as it seemed a bit cheaply made) and &#8216;Zeroing&#8217; setup makes this a great buy. I recommend this scope over many more expensive ones I own. Leave it to Nikon to make an affordable useful scope. Thank you!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
