Comments on: Primer Comparison Testing with 6 BRA at 500 Yards https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/04/primer-comparison-testing-with-6-bra-at-500-yards/ from AccurateShooter.com Sun, 07 Jun 2026 10:05:48 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26 By: jimmy james https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/04/primer-comparison-testing-with-6-bra-at-500-yards/comment-page-1/#comment-56965 Tue, 09 Apr 2019 12:24:13 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62421#comment-56965 The Rem 7&1/2 result wont matter if you cant buy them anymore. Anybody know for sure?

]]> By: Patrick https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/04/primer-comparison-testing-with-6-bra-at-500-yards/comment-page-1/#comment-56956 Sun, 07 Apr 2019 14:16:31 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62421#comment-56956 What this tells me is that there is no difference in primers (for us lowly varmint hunters). :)

]]> By: ELR Researcher https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/04/primer-comparison-testing-with-6-bra-at-500-yards/comment-page-1/#comment-56952 Sat, 06 Apr 2019 18:28:32 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62421#comment-56952 As the author noted, “Of course I could repeat the test tomorrow and it could be exact opposite of today’s test.”

IMO, way light on data. Seeing a 5X difference in ES for the top two, very similar accuracy examples, is very telling.

Suggest a much more rigorous testing scenario, e.g., from a dedicated industrial rest in a controlled, industrial environment, 10-shot groups and several groups (min 5) for each sample primer lot. And then repeat against several primer lots (min 5) for each primer.

]]> By: tenring https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/04/primer-comparison-testing-with-6-bra-at-500-yards/comment-page-1/#comment-56950 Sat, 06 Apr 2019 17:23:54 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62421#comment-56950 These results may be entirely different in another rifle, brass, bullet, etc

]]>