<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday GunDay: .308 Win for PRS and NRL Tactical Division</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/06/sunday-gunday-308-win-for-prs-and-nrl-tactical-division/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/06/sunday-gunday-308-win-for-prs-and-nrl-tactical-division/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaleb McSwain</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/06/sunday-gunday-308-win-for-prs-and-nrl-tactical-division/comment-page-1/#comment-59619</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaleb McSwain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 01:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62689#comment-59619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What was the OAL of the cartridges and the jump for the two bullets?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the OAL of the cartridges and the jump for the two bullets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Kemp</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/06/sunday-gunday-308-win-for-prs-and-nrl-tactical-division/comment-page-1/#comment-57249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon Kemp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2019 06:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62689#comment-57249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it a 1:9 or a 1:10 Brux barrel. Two different reports.

Editor: The First barrel was a 1:11&quot;, the second a 1:9&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it a 1:9 or a 1:10 Brux barrel. Two different reports.</p>
<p>Editor: The First barrel was a 1:11&#8243;, the second a 1:9&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude Gilbert</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/06/sunday-gunday-308-win-for-prs-and-nrl-tactical-division/comment-page-1/#comment-57204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claude Gilbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 11:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62689#comment-57204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People are forgetting how to shoot with out some kind of rest , that&#039;s the fun part.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are forgetting how to shoot with out some kind of rest , that&#8217;s the fun part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/06/sunday-gunday-308-win-for-prs-and-nrl-tactical-division/comment-page-1/#comment-57203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62689#comment-57203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a reply to Richard: There are already plenty of shooting competitions here in the US that do exactly that. CMP Service Rifle, Palma, and High Power Rifle all cater to exactly that style of shooting. They already exist, and are quite popular.

However they are also but are quite regimented, repetitive, and not all that appealing to the younger crowds. And in some cases they are not new shooter friendly.

As far as I&#039;m concerned US match directors should keep on doing what they want. There&#039;s plenty of options out there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a reply to Richard: There are already plenty of shooting competitions here in the US that do exactly that. CMP Service Rifle, Palma, and High Power Rifle all cater to exactly that style of shooting. They already exist, and are quite popular.</p>
<p>However they are also but are quite regimented, repetitive, and not all that appealing to the younger crowds. And in some cases they are not new shooter friendly.</p>
<p>As far as I&#8217;m concerned US match directors should keep on doing what they want. There&#8217;s plenty of options out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim See</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/06/sunday-gunday-308-win-for-prs-and-nrl-tactical-division/comment-page-1/#comment-57202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim See]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62689#comment-57202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t be fooled into giving up on a well designed and built .308 Win. That soda bottle was shot at a mile with a 168 grain Berger Hybrid on top of Varget. Proper twisting of the .308 barrel will result in a clean sub sonic transition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be fooled into giving up on a well designed and built .308 Win. That soda bottle was shot at a mile with a 168 grain Berger Hybrid on top of Varget. Proper twisting of the .308 barrel will result in a clean sub sonic transition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/06/sunday-gunday-308-win-for-prs-and-nrl-tactical-division/comment-page-1/#comment-57196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2019 20:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62689#comment-57196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m still struggling with this move to heavy rifles for practical/tactical shooting.  Our US brothers seem to favour supported positions, bipods and barricades over slings and positional shooting.

Our experience is that weight soon gets chopped when you have to sling up for a stage or two of Prone Unsupported.

We think the US Match Directors may soon (should soon?) realise this and start including a couple of sling stages to open up the competition again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still struggling with this move to heavy rifles for practical/tactical shooting.  Our US brothers seem to favour supported positions, bipods and barricades over slings and positional shooting.</p>
<p>Our experience is that weight soon gets chopped when you have to sling up for a stage or two of Prone Unsupported.</p>
<p>We think the US Match Directors may soon (should soon?) realise this and start including a couple of sling stages to open up the competition again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
