Comments on: Tough Burris Tactical Rings with Inserts — Best Option for PRS? https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/06/tough-tactical-rings-with-inserts-best-option-for-prs/ from AccurateShooter.com Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:54:23 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26 By: PeterV https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/06/tough-tactical-rings-with-inserts-best-option-for-prs/comment-page-1/#comment-57292 Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:23:32 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62806#comment-57292 Buy with confidence. I have been using these rings on multiple rifles for years. I have taken the rings (still holding the scope) off a rifle for transport, and put them back on again. No problem. Zero maintained. I use this XTRs or signature Zees for virtually all my rifles now. They give you extra MOA, allow you to compensate for alignment issue. I suspect the guy who complained did not torque the base clamps to procedure, or maybe he removed the scope itself from the ring set — that can jiggle the polymer inserts.

]]> By: D - 4297 https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/06/tough-tactical-rings-with-inserts-best-option-for-prs/comment-page-1/#comment-57288 Sun, 23 Jun 2019 20:13:23 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62806#comment-57288 I have them on a F-Open rifle (7.62 x 54r) , and a F-TR gun (Kelby.308) , and have had no issues with either in over three years .Just follow the instructions and they work just fine . I give the five stars across the board .

]]> By: JCS https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/06/tough-tactical-rings-with-inserts-best-option-for-prs/comment-page-1/#comment-57287 Sun, 23 Jun 2019 20:03:07 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62806#comment-57287 What isn’t mentioned is that these rings do not return to zero. Mount a scope with them, take the scope off and put it back on and the scope points in a different direction. Burris clearly have paid no attention to user feedback on this product. I mark it as 4/10.

Editor: We disagree 100% and so do over the vast majority of the owner/reviewers. I suspect you did not have the inserts matched correctly or there was something wrong with your rail or you didn’t tension the crossbolts with the correct procedure. I have dismounted a scope held in these rings, put it back on, shot it at 600 yards and the horizontal zero was perfect and the vertical was changed one 1/4-MOA click from previous 600-yard session, and that can easily be due to temp/humidity changes.

There are 69 reviews of this product on MidwayUSA from actual buyers. Total rating 4.6 out of 5 stars, with the vast majority at 5 stars. Read the reviews — many of the 46 state how the product returns perfectly to zero. Here are just two of many hugely positive comments: “They hold zero, protect your scope from marring and allow you to center your reticle without using up your turrets adjustments. Just may be the best rings for long range target rifles that you can buy” and “Bought these rings to mount an expensive Swarovski scope on my Ruger SR 762 (AR 10). I bought the extra high rings. The polymer insets allowed me to cant and zero the scope without using hardly any internal adjustment left and right. Also I added 20 moa of up cant to leave plenty of up travel. The inserts make it so you never need to shim, and they lock the scope in tight with no scratches or scope damage. In my opinion, they are the best rings you can buy.”

On Amazon, you can read scores of buyer reviews, again over-whelmingly positive — 4.5 stars overall with 81% Five-star. Many users stating these are the best rings they’ve ever owned and the inserts allow handy long-range elevation. I suggest to readers that they read the reviews.

These rings are designed for true Picatinny rails. Some “Weaver-style” rails are not dimensionally correct. I suspect the poster’s issue was having the wrong style rail.

]]>