<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cutting .338 LM Barrel from 30&#8243; to 17&#8243; &#8212; Velocity Loss Revealed!</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-57584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2019 21:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63126#comment-57584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article.  If I&#039;m being honest though,  I&#039;d have really liked to see the accuracy variances along the way. With all the work that went into this, it just doesn&#039;t seem like that much more work to me.  Again though, very well done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  If I&#8217;m being honest though,  I&#8217;d have really liked to see the accuracy variances along the way. With all the work that went into this, it just doesn&#8217;t seem like that much more work to me.  Again though, very well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-57574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63126#comment-57574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The curves are hard to interpolate velocity values for the chosen grid.  It would have been nice to see 100fps increments instead of 150.

Also the curve looks too smooth for the 250gr bullets.  Lets see the actual data points!

Editor: Guys, go to the full article! There are links in our summary. Rifleshooter.com article has full tables with inch by inch data.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The curves are hard to interpolate velocity values for the chosen grid.  It would have been nice to see 100fps increments instead of 150.</p>
<p>Also the curve looks too smooth for the 250gr bullets.  Lets see the actual data points!</p>
<p>Editor: Guys, go to the full article! There are links in our summary. Rifleshooter.com article has full tables with inch by inch data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Allen</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-57573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boyd Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63126#comment-57573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great find. I applaud the effort and its inclusion here. For future efforts I have a suggestion. Use ES since the sample sizes (four shots per load) are a tad lean for meaningful SDs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great find. I applaud the effort and its inclusion here. For future efforts I have a suggestion. Use ES since the sample sizes (four shots per load) are a tad lean for meaningful SDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
