<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neck Bushing Concentricity Tested &#8212; With Surprising Results!</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/neck-bushing-concentricity-tested-with-surprising-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/neck-bushing-concentricity-tested-with-surprising-results/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 20:57:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/neck-bushing-concentricity-tested-with-surprising-results/comment-page-1/#comment-57514</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 11:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63049#comment-57514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i get run-out from my redding body die :(

but on testing concentricity with concentricity gauge; maybe this method is wrong.

imho, it doesn&#039;t matter if inside-to-outside of the bushing is not concentric. on outside bushing is floating and it can be OK with center of the neck.
like j.borden say: check perpendicularity of hole in bushing to top surface.
i think that it doesnt matter if outside of bushing is oval; inside must be perfect round AND this hole MUST be perpendicularity to the case.
with concentricity gauge you cant measure that; imho...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i get run-out from my redding body die <img src="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt=":(" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>but on testing concentricity with concentricity gauge; maybe this method is wrong.</p>
<p>imho, it doesn&#8217;t matter if inside-to-outside of the bushing is not concentric. on outside bushing is floating and it can be OK with center of the neck.<br />
like j.borden say: check perpendicularity of hole in bushing to top surface.<br />
i think that it doesnt matter if outside of bushing is oval; inside must be perfect round AND this hole MUST be perpendicularity to the case.<br />
with concentricity gauge you cant measure that; imho&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PracticalTactical</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/neck-bushing-concentricity-tested-with-surprising-results/comment-page-1/#comment-57503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PracticalTactical]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63049#comment-57503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve found that the less you have to reduce the neck diameter, the more concentric the necks are.

That builds a case for reduced clearance necks in the chambers.

The more you size them down, the more they can get off center.

Another key point when using bushing dies… Ever notice how easy it is to retract the press after sizing the neck only die? 

That’s because these bushings induce a taper if sizing down more than about 0.008” and the mouth is about 0.002” smaller than it is closer to the shoulder.

My work around is to size the necks twice… the first pass is 0.002” larger than my target bushing… The second pass with the final bushing size makes the neck walls parallel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve found that the less you have to reduce the neck diameter, the more concentric the necks are.</p>
<p>That builds a case for reduced clearance necks in the chambers.</p>
<p>The more you size them down, the more they can get off center.</p>
<p>Another key point when using bushing dies… Ever notice how easy it is to retract the press after sizing the neck only die? </p>
<p>That’s because these bushings induce a taper if sizing down more than about 0.008” and the mouth is about 0.002” smaller than it is closer to the shoulder.</p>
<p>My work around is to size the necks twice… the first pass is 0.002” larger than my target bushing… The second pass with the final bushing size makes the neck walls parallel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/neck-bushing-concentricity-tested-with-surprising-results/comment-page-1/#comment-57502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63049#comment-57502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great info Boyd. Thanks for sharing this valuable piece of info.

Paul]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info Boyd. Thanks for sharing this valuable piece of info.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Allen</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/neck-bushing-concentricity-tested-with-surprising-results/comment-page-1/#comment-57497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boyd Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63049#comment-57497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once you have decided what bushing your are going to use for a particular application, if you really want a better bushing, I suggest that you try the more expensive option of carbide. They are ground rather than turned and much more dimensionally correct. Also, I have found no advantage to coated bushings. I prefer the Wilson brand because you can get a half thousandth more sizing by flipping them over. Whidden bought out his bushing subcontractor and those bushings are well made.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once you have decided what bushing your are going to use for a particular application, if you really want a better bushing, I suggest that you try the more expensive option of carbide. They are ground rather than turned and much more dimensionally correct. Also, I have found no advantage to coated bushings. I prefer the Wilson brand because you can get a half thousandth more sizing by flipping them over. Whidden bought out his bushing subcontractor and those bushings are well made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
