<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Matchmaster Twin-Tube Powder Dispenser/Scale from RCBS</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/10/new-matchmaster-twin-tube-powder-dispenserscale-from-rcbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/10/new-matchmaster-twin-tube-powder-dispenserscale-from-rcbs/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Cox</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/10/new-matchmaster-twin-tube-powder-dispenserscale-from-rcbs/comment-page-1/#comment-57773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Cox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63312#comment-57773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fool and his money soon part.
I own two 1500 Chargemasters &amp; 1 A&amp;D J123 Scale. The 1500 Chargemaster can be programmed to speed up the dispensing, and the accuracy is STILL, .10 (1/10th GN). 
 You&#039;re better off buying a NEW 1500 for $375 and spend another $350 for a quality scale to trickle to like a A&amp;D J123 scale. But i&#039;m sure some specific gun youtubers will get one sent to them to &quot;pimp&quot; and reel in the fools.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fool and his money soon part.<br />
I own two 1500 Chargemasters &amp; 1 A&amp;D J123 Scale. The 1500 Chargemaster can be programmed to speed up the dispensing, and the accuracy is STILL, .10 (1/10th GN).<br />
 You&#8217;re better off buying a NEW 1500 for $375 and spend another $350 for a quality scale to trickle to like a A&amp;D J123 scale. But i&#8217;m sure some specific gun youtubers will get one sent to them to &#8220;pimp&#8221; and reel in the fools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Dozier</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/10/new-matchmaster-twin-tube-powder-dispenserscale-from-rcbs/comment-page-1/#comment-57746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate Dozier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2019 15:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63312#comment-57746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for broadcasting this]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for broadcasting this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pirate Ammo</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/10/new-matchmaster-twin-tube-powder-dispenserscale-from-rcbs/comment-page-1/#comment-57744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pirate Ammo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2019 03:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63312#comment-57744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[.04Gr.  I can live with that, w&#039;ll see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.04Gr.  I can live with that, w&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/10/new-matchmaster-twin-tube-powder-dispenserscale-from-rcbs/comment-page-1/#comment-57731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63312#comment-57731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice, but i would hope that they would focus on better weight precision, not &#039;cool&#039; features like bluetooth and 100+1 functions...

i am not convinced that scale in this machine is worth 100$, so real precision and standard deviations of measurements are questionable... imho]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice, but i would hope that they would focus on better weight precision, not &#8216;cool&#8217; features like bluetooth and 100+1 functions&#8230;</p>
<p>i am not convinced that scale in this machine is worth 100$, so real precision and standard deviations of measurements are questionable&#8230; imho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
