<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Berger Releases NEW 6.5mm 144gr LR Hybrid Target Bullet</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/12/berger-releases-new-6-5mm-144gr-lr-hybrid-target-bullet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/12/berger-releases-new-6-5mm-144gr-lr-hybrid-target-bullet/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hanka</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/12/berger-releases-new-6-5mm-144gr-lr-hybrid-target-bullet/comment-page-1/#comment-57905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Hanka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2019 05:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63566#comment-57905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wanting to stay within a certain twist rate for marketing reasons is a valid tradeoff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wanting to stay within a certain twist rate for marketing reasons is a valid tradeoff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grimstod</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/12/berger-releases-new-6-5mm-144gr-lr-hybrid-target-bullet/comment-page-1/#comment-57904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grimstod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2019 11:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63566#comment-57904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would probably then require a 1:7.5 twist instead of the 1:8. This no doubt drove that decision in the design.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would probably then require a 1:7.5 twist instead of the 1:8. This no doubt drove that decision in the design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hanka</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/12/berger-releases-new-6-5mm-144gr-lr-hybrid-target-bullet/comment-page-1/#comment-57902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Hanka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 18:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63566#comment-57902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nose length on this new 144 hybrid is 0.742. Nose length on existing 140 hybrid is 0.768. The improvement in BC comes from 4 extra grains mass and a more pointed MRT meplat. Could we have squeezed a few more BC points at no extra cost if we&#039;d had the slightly sleeker 140 nose on this new 144? Maybe 0.662 BC instead of 0.655?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nose length on this new 144 hybrid is 0.742. Nose length on existing 140 hybrid is 0.768. The improvement in BC comes from 4 extra grains mass and a more pointed MRT meplat. Could we have squeezed a few more BC points at no extra cost if we&#8217;d had the slightly sleeker 140 nose on this new 144? Maybe 0.662 BC instead of 0.655?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smaller</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/12/berger-releases-new-6-5mm-144gr-lr-hybrid-target-bullet/comment-page-1/#comment-57901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smaller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 11:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63566#comment-57901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s next?

A heavy 7mm LRHT ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s next?</p>
<p>A heavy 7mm LRHT &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
