<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Berger 7mm 190 Grain Long Range Hybrid Target Bullet</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/01/new-berger-7mm-190-grain-long-range-hybrid-target-bullet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/01/new-berger-7mm-190-grain-long-range-hybrid-target-bullet/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 11:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Royse Joe</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/01/new-berger-7mm-190-grain-long-range-hybrid-target-bullet/comment-page-1/#comment-57982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Royse Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2020 20:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63696#comment-57982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[184H for F class, then 190H for F class .... very sneaky way of Berger to induce guys to rethink something that “we all know” just can’t be possible.  The 195 EOL for F class.   But in a .284 and only with a 9 twist, could it be?   I won’t say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>184H for F class, then 190H for F class &#8230;. very sneaky way of Berger to induce guys to rethink something that “we all know” just can’t be possible.  The 195 EOL for F class.   But in a .284 and only with a 9 twist, could it be?   I won’t say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
