<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angular Measurement &#8212; Mil vs. MOA &#8212; What You Need to Know</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/06/angular-measurement-mil-vs-moa-what-you-need-to-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/06/angular-measurement-mil-vs-moa-what-you-need-to-know/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:50:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/06/angular-measurement-mil-vs-moa-what-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-56792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 10:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61013#comment-56792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mil for tactical, 1/8 moa for sport, 1/4 moa for hunt :D

some even have 2,5mm/click, 1/10 moa, 1/6 moa, 5mm...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mil for tactical, 1/8 moa for sport, 1/4 moa for hunt <img src="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>some even have 2,5mm/click, 1/10 moa, 1/6 moa, 5mm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris-NZ</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/06/angular-measurement-mil-vs-moa-what-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-56787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris-NZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61013#comment-56787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is this topic done to death on a regular basis? In essence, they&#039;re just a different unit and both are proportional to distance. What&#039;s the big deal?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this topic done to death on a regular basis? In essence, they&#8217;re just a different unit and both are proportional to distance. What&#8217;s the big deal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lawson</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/06/angular-measurement-mil-vs-moa-what-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-54784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Lawson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2018 04:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61013#comment-54784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At our shooting range you are considered silly if you have a mil scope. MOA is so much handier and more useful there is no comparison.
Scopes that use left-hand screw direction are another pain in the bum.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At our shooting range you are considered silly if you have a mil scope. MOA is so much handier and more useful there is no comparison.<br />
Scopes that use left-hand screw direction are another pain in the bum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/06/angular-measurement-mil-vs-moa-what-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-54773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 20:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61013#comment-54773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not the best explainer in the world.

However... I suppose one of the key messages I have taken away from scope developments over the past decade or so, is the rise and rise of useful high magnification scopes.

The days of cross hairs blocking out the target are over and that calls for a rethink in how we approach scope use.  

There is also a global divide here, where the metric system offers more precise and easier to calculate hold offs based on a decimal system that translates nicely into the the MIL system&#039;s subtensions.  Having that same subtension throughout the power range is a massive simplifying step.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the best explainer in the world.</p>
<p>However&#8230; I suppose one of the key messages I have taken away from scope developments over the past decade or so, is the rise and rise of useful high magnification scopes.</p>
<p>The days of cross hairs blocking out the target are over and that calls for a rethink in how we approach scope use.  </p>
<p>There is also a global divide here, where the metric system offers more precise and easier to calculate hold offs based on a decimal system that translates nicely into the the MIL system&#8217;s subtensions.  Having that same subtension throughout the power range is a massive simplifying step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/06/angular-measurement-mil-vs-moa-what-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-54767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61013#comment-54767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a radian is also a measure of angle.  One radian =57.3 degrees or one milliradian is 3.44 minutes. or one click on a scope with .1 mils turrets is .344 moa. versus the usual one click.25 moa turrets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a radian is also a measure of angle.  One radian =57.3 degrees or one milliradian is 3.44 minutes. or one click on a scope with .1 mils turrets is .344 moa. versus the usual one click.25 moa turrets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MH</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/06/angular-measurement-mil-vs-moa-what-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-54764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61013#comment-54764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My advice is to pick one or the other and stick with it for all your scopes, because once you get used to MOA, it&#039;s hard to think in MILS and vice versa.

For hunting it makes little difference.

For tactical competitions, MILS are faster and it&#039;s probably what your fellow competitors are using.

For precision based competition like F Class or bench rest MILS are very rare at least from my experience, and MOA with 1/8 click are popular, as competitors are looking for the most precise aiming point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My advice is to pick one or the other and stick with it for all your scopes, because once you get used to MOA, it&#8217;s hard to think in MILS and vice versa.</p>
<p>For hunting it makes little difference.</p>
<p>For tactical competitions, MILS are faster and it&#8217;s probably what your fellow competitors are using.</p>
<p>For precision based competition like F Class or bench rest MILS are very rare at least from my experience, and MOA with 1/8 click are popular, as competitors are looking for the most precise aiming point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
