<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AR-15 Critical Failure &#8212; Bolt Breaks into Two Pieces</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/02/ar-15-critical-failure-bolt-breaks-into-two-pieces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/02/ar-15-critical-failure-bolt-breaks-into-two-pieces/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/02/ar-15-critical-failure-bolt-breaks-into-two-pieces/comment-page-1/#comment-59414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=65503#comment-59414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a &quot;hole&quot; is the most highly stressed part of a design.....

As a now-retired military &quot;gum plumber&quot;, I see this fracture as not entirely surprising.

If nobody keeps tabs on the approximate  round count for small arms, especially ones used for &quot;training&quot;; course, after course after course, things will go awry.

Detailed cleaning? Routine examination by dedicated and qualified technical personnel?

ONE small rust pit inside that &quot;hole&quot; and that is the beginning of a stress riser. It is likely that when someone competent takes a look at the break surfaces, there will be clues.

A worn cam pin will load the bearing surfaces of the &quot;hole&quot; differently and the thin webs of the hole will start to &quot;flex&quot; on a micro scale; NOT a good look.


To me, there seem to have been &quot;oversight / errors&quot; all the way up the food chain, from the shooter to the armoury management and beyond. Checking the serial numbers in and out of the armoury does not constitute a maintenance programme.

Yeah, stuff breaks, well-designed stuff breaks less catastrophically for the operator;........ mostly.

&quot;Training pool&quot; equipment, be it weapons, vehicles, radios, etc, are a good place to study &quot;human behavior&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a &#8220;hole&#8221; is the most highly stressed part of a design&#8230;..</p>
<p>As a now-retired military &#8220;gum plumber&#8221;, I see this fracture as not entirely surprising.</p>
<p>If nobody keeps tabs on the approximate  round count for small arms, especially ones used for &#8220;training&#8221;; course, after course after course, things will go awry.</p>
<p>Detailed cleaning? Routine examination by dedicated and qualified technical personnel?</p>
<p>ONE small rust pit inside that &#8220;hole&#8221; and that is the beginning of a stress riser. It is likely that when someone competent takes a look at the break surfaces, there will be clues.</p>
<p>A worn cam pin will load the bearing surfaces of the &#8220;hole&#8221; differently and the thin webs of the hole will start to &#8220;flex&#8221; on a micro scale; NOT a good look.</p>
<p>To me, there seem to have been &#8220;oversight / errors&#8221; all the way up the food chain, from the shooter to the armoury management and beyond. Checking the serial numbers in and out of the armoury does not constitute a maintenance programme.</p>
<p>Yeah, stuff breaks, well-designed stuff breaks less catastrophically for the operator;&#8230;&#8230;.. mostly.</p>
<p>&#8220;Training pool&#8221; equipment, be it weapons, vehicles, radios, etc, are a good place to study &#8220;human behavior&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
